Search Results

1. [2021] NZREADT 24 - Baker v Real Estate Agents Authority (18 May 2021) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...and are unlikely to occur again. He also submitted that Mr Drumm will suffer reputational damage from publication which may impact on his career advancement. [3] He further submitted that the appellants are likely to seek their own form of justice for which publication of Mr Drumm’s name will provide ammunition. In his penalty submissions, Mr Dewar stated that on 24 July 2020 (the day the Committee’s decision to take no further action was issued) Mr Baker contacted the Autho...

2. Mullane v Attorney-General (Request for Transcript) [2021] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...direction that the transcript be provided. See Siemer v Heron [2011] NZSC 116 at [9]: [9] ... There are obvious resource implications if judges direct court registries to provide parties with transcripts of hearings of appeals and interlocutory matters generally on demand by litigants. For that reason, judges should always first satisfy themselves that there is good reason in the interests of justice for giving such directions. In this case, the Judge was clearly of the view that in th...

3. [2016] EmpC 128 Vasona Networks Inc v Sunder [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...challenge the determination. He said costs incurred by such a challenge, including those associated with Mr Sood travelling from the United States of America to New Zealand for a trial, outweighed the benefits as he saw them at that time. [11] Matters have now changed given Mr Sunder’s proceeding in EMPC 170/2016 is a de novo challenge placing in issue almost all of the matters that were heard and decided by the Authority. Mr Sood deposed to his belief that he considered exact...

4. IQ Ltd & Ors v ND Ltd [2023] NZDT 638 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...more members over separate SUIP rates charged by ND Ltd. Both claims were set down to be heard together and the jurisdiction issues raised by ND Ltd to be dealt with at the outset. 3. ND Ltd has raised several objections to jurisdiction: Subject matter; prior determination by High Court Arbitrator; Owners’ status as representative; monetary claim limit, arbitration clause and that the Tribunal does not have authority to make declarations. 4. At the first hearing on 15 June 2023,...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 1 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packaging Ltd [pdf, 28 KB]

   HOWARD v CARTER HOLT HARVEY PACKAGING LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 1 [9 January 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 1 CRC 47/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time for filing a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEAN HOWARD Applicant AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY PACKAGING LIMITED Respondent Hearing: on the papers - documents received 7 October, 21 O...

6. IU Ltd v NO [2023] NZDT 409 (26 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...APPLICANT IU Ltd RESPONDENT NO The Tribunal orders: NO shall pay IU Ltd $4,016.55 by 18 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In August 2020, the Respondent contacted the Applicant law firm seeking legal assistance with a relationship property matter. The Applicant sent the Respondent an engagement letter on 13 August 2020 setting out the Applicant’s fee structure and terms and conditions. The Respondent acknowledged receipt by email undertaking to sign and return it but failed...

7. IACDT - Annual -report 2014 [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...2010. He is also the Customs Appeal Authority. Mr Pearson is a former member of the Removal Review Authority and the Refugee Status Appeals Authority. He was the Deputy Chair of the Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal from 1999-2001. MATTERS ARISING IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS Caseload During the preceding year, the Tribunal addressed procedural issues that were a barrier to efficiently processing complaints. This created an increased burden on the IAA, which had to file compl...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 17 Secretary for Justice v Dodd [pdf, 17 KB]

   SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE V DODD WN 5 March 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 17 WRC 52/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Plaintiff AND CATHERINE ANNE DODD Defendant Hearing: 5 March 2010 (by telephone conference call) Appearances: Alastair Sherriff and Brigette Shone, Counsel for Plaintiff Susan Hughes QC, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 5 March 2010...

9. OIA-109180.pdf [pdf, 996 KB]

   ...number of developers 6. Total number of ICT staff in management roles 7. Total number of staff involved with project management 8. Total number of business analysts 9. Total number of testers 10. Total number of information and data subject matter experts 11. Total number of scrum masters 12. Total number of product owners (that are with ICT team) 13. Total number of staff involved with strategy development and implementation, transformation, portfolio management, monitoring,...

10. JM v Minister for NZSIS (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2022] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...should be able to hold those ministers to account, so that their actions are subject to judicial scrutiny. Should name suppression not be available in cases like JM’s, there would be a chilling effect, or a frustration of the administration of justice and no such cases would be brought. [13] With his application for suppression orders JM filed an affidavit and also affidavits from [redacted]. JM’s affidavit simply states that all information in his submissions is true. [redacteds...