Search Results

1. Peita v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 179 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

2. Rix v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 185 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

3. Hwang v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 184 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

4. Chandler v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 30 (20 February 2025) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

5. Kinzett v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 76 (7 May 2025) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

6. Te Huia v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 77 (7 May 2025) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

7. Roberts v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 45 (13 March 2025) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

8. Haliday v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 187 (21 November 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

9. BORA Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Bill [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching that conclusion, we have considered possible inconsistencies with ss 14 (freedom of expression), 21 (unreasonable search and seizure), 25(c) (presumption of innocence) and 27(1) (right to natural justice). Our analysis under those sections is set out below. PURPOSE OF THE BILL 3. The purpose of the Bill is to establish an environmental management regime for New Zealand’s Exclusive Economic Zone (‘EEZ’) and continental shel...

10. Stanley v Committee of Management for Maraeroa C Inc. - Maraeroa C Inc. (2021) 217 Waikato Maniapoto MB 242 (217 WMN 242) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20200009922 WĀHANGA Under Section 59, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Maraeroa C Incorporation I WAENGA I A Between KELVIN EDWARD STANLEY Te kaitono Applicant ME And COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT FOR MARAEROA C INCORPORATION Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Heari...