Search Results

1. Gray v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 186 (3 November 2025) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [8] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical ch...

2. Wanhalla v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 183 (29 October 2025) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: 1 Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86, 91. 3 When once an appellant al...

3. Koloni v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 182 (29 October 2025) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

4. Dwyer v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of appeal to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 159 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...scheme is minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. 3 [7] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a rad...

5. BORA Social Assistance (Debt Prevention and Minimisation) Amendment Bill [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...Development (MSD), the Department of Corrections and the New Zealand Customs Service. This amendment will allow MSD to use the information for debt recovery purposes. ISSUE OF INCONSISTENCY WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT Section 27(1): Right to natural justice 5. Section 27(1) of the Bill of Rights Act provides that every person whose interests are affected by a decision by a public authority has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice. One of the fundamental pr...

6. NZCVS Cycle 4 - Key Findings Booklet [pdf, 908 KB]

   ...Victims Survey Key Findings Booklet Cycle 4 November 2020 - November 2021 2 Disclaimer 1. While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting data and information for this publication, the Ministry of Justice gives no warranty that it is error free and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the use directly, or indirectly, of the information in this publication. 2. Data collection was suspended during COVID-19 Al...

7. LCRO 152/2025 CK v LE (11 November 2025) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...making an application clearly lies with the Applicant. This position is reiterated by previous decisions of this Office that the LCRO has no discretion to extend the timeframe. [12] This was confirmed by this Office in UQ v OI as follows:2 As a matter of jurisdiction this office has no discretion to accept review applications that are outside of the statutory time limit. Section 198 of the Act requires an application for Review to be lodged “within 30 working days after a copy o...

8. Cutforth v Dudley - Omapere Taraire E and Rangihamama X3A Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 157 Taitokerau MB 7 (157 TTK 7) [pdf, 219 KB]

   157 Taitokerau MB 7 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20160006309 A20170004180 UNDER Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Omapere Taraire E & Rangihamama X3A Ahu Whenua Trust BETWEEN BRUCE CUTFORTH, TAOKO WIHONGI, TE TUHI ROBUST, RNAIERA SONNY TAU AND COLLEEN BERMINGHAM BROWN AS TRUSTEES OF THE OMAPERE TARAIRE E & RANGIHAMAMA X3A AHU WHENUA TRUST Applicants AND ROSE DUDLE...

9. Tairua - Succession to Tihema Takena Wihongi [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1669 (2024 CJ 1669) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District AP-20230000028398 A20200013413 CJ 2020/56 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Tihema Takena Wihongi NĀ By ASHTON EUGENE TAIRUA Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 26 March 2024, 2024 Chief Judge MB 446-458 (Heard at Wellington via Zoom) Whakataunga: Judgme...

10. Osborne v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 195 (27 November 2024) [pdf, 155 KB]

    ...minimising the economic, social and personal costs of the impact of injury on the community. Unnecessary delay in 3 bringing an appeal to the ACC jurisdiction of the District Court carries potential costs for the appellant and also for the justice system and those involved in it. [8] In Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board,1 Richmond J (for the Court of Appeal) stated: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical chang...