8462 items matching your search terms
...first Application(s)/Order(s) Responding to additional Application(s)/Order(s) Summons to attend Additional factors – Application(s)/Order(s) Specialist Reports Cost of instructing health assessor(s) or Restorative Justice provider(s) Pre-Hearing Matters Pre-hearing Meeting(s) – Preparation Pre-hearing Meeting(s) – Time Instructing agent Additional factors – Pre-hearing matters Defended Hearing(s) Comply...
W I T H F O C U S O N T H E E N V I R O N M E N T C O U R T O F N E W Z E A L A N D P R I N C I P A L E N V I R O N M E N T J U D G E L A U R E N C E N E W H O O K ( N Z ) Environmental Justice - The New Zealand Model Main Topics (a) The New Zealand model of environmental jurisdiction, and relevant procedural aspects (b) Statistics about the cases processed in the Court (c) Competencies of the Court (matters, actions and standing) (d) Leading cases (e) Positive and neg...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
...the applicable timeframe for filing and ought to have been complied with; it was not, so leave is necessary. [5] The second issue is whether leave ought to be granted. The Court has a broad discretion: the overriding factor is the interests of justice. The factors generally taken into account are well known and include the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the conduct of the parties, any prejudice or hardship to the respondent and the significance of the issues rai...
...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 17 June 2025 Ref: OIA 122270 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Redundancy payments and cost savings Thank you for your email of 19 May 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding redundancy payments and cost savings. Specifically, you requested: 1. The agency's total r...
...case 4. Do you have any other suggestions for more child-responsive court processes or services? Separate funding for child specialists in FDR process. 5. Should obligations be placed on the Ministry and/ or the Government to improve family justice outcomes for Māori? Yes. What would these obligations be? To make sure cultural considerations are understood and taken into account in decisions. I feel this ought to apply to all cultures, e.g. Asian, Russian, Middle Eastern. 6. How...
PSA – MOJ Rūnanga Committee submission for Strengthening the family justice system. March 2019. Strengthening the family justice system - Consultation Document Submission of PSA Ministry of Justice Rūnanga Delegate Committee “Tawhiti rawa i tō tātou haerenga atu te kore haere tonu, maha rawa o tātou mahi te kore mahi tonu.” We have come too far to not go further, we have done too much to not do more - Sir James Henare Who we are We represent over 350...
An application by E Moss for access to Court documents on file EMPC 253/2015 NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 125 [16 October 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 125 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application by Emma Moss of Work Law Ltd for access to Court documents Hearing: On the papers filed on 29 September, 6 October and 12 October 2017 Appearances: E Moss, in person Counsel for parties affected by the application...
WILSON v WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL – INTERIM DECISION AS TO COSTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 70 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN WARWICK SUTHERLAND WILSON (ENV-2020-AKL-51) Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND OHINAU AQUACULTURE LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Sitting alone unde...