AB v WA & Ors LCRO 68/2015 (11 July 2016) [pdf, 67 KB]
...with intent to conspire to defeat justice. (c) Made their decisions without receiving full responses from the practitioners, when the practitioners were concealing the truth and obstructing the administration of justice. (d) Were aware that the matters the practitioners refused to respond to were substantive and criminal matters and the Committee concealed this. (e) Allowed the lawyers to obstruct, hinder, resist and deceive the Standards Committee. (f) Ignored the evidence provided...