Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 172 — Brown v ACC (12 September 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: 1 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801, (2017) 23 PRNZ 533. 3 (a)...

2. [2022] NZACC-173 — Cockburn v ACC (12 September 2022) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

3. [2022] NZACC 175 — Wood v ACC (12 September 2022) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

4. [2022] NZACC 210 — Taylor v ACC (17 November 2022) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...without opposition from the respondent. 1 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801, (2017) 23 PRNZ 533. 3 [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

5. IC v GN [2020] NZDT 1512 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

6. KI v ST & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 585 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

7. BORA Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill (No3) Supplementary Order Paper [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...classifying restricted substances; • applying the "affirmative resolution" process of Order in Council to the scheduling of restricted substances; and • requiring restrictions on sale or supply of a substance that may be related to matters of age, advertising, and labelling. After any Order in Council has been approved by resolution of the House of Representatives, a commencement order may be made bringing the Order in Council into force. 4. New sections 47 and 65 of...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 12 McNabb v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...arguable case; 3 (d) she cannot provide evidence of funds to meet a costs award; (e) the level of security sought would result in her being unable to continue with the matter; (f) the requirement to pay security for costs will prevent access to justice and create unreasonable burdens in the legal system. [9] She filed no evidence in opposition to the application. [10] Mr Mitchell, who is acting for Ms McNabb, but, at this point, only in relation to this application, acknowl...

9. Watene raua ko Ema Kawiti Whānau Trust v Kawiti - Motatau 2 Section 65A (2016) 139 Taitokerau MB 136 (139 TTK 136) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...principles concerning the grant of an interim injunction are settled. The applicant must show that: (a) There is a serious question to be tried; (b) The balance of convenience is in favour of an interim injunction; and (c) That the interests of justice support the grant of an interim injunction. Is there a serious question to be tried? [10] In determining whether there is a serious question to be tried it is necessary to consider the allegations before the Court, the applicable...

10. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Ltd (Stay) [2019] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...2018, Ms Doria filed proceedings against the defendants in the Tribunal under the HRA. She had previously been employed by the defendants. Her claim concerned their alleged discriminatory treatment of her by reason of her pregnancy. One of the matters she complained about was being forced to take parental leave when she was in the early stages of pregnancy and wished to continue working. [4] The defendants filed a reply under protest of jurisdiction and a strike-out application. Th...