Search Results

1. Erueti - Kohatu o te Haua No 9 (1996) 5 Taitokerau Appellate MB 53 (5 APWH 53) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. cancel or amend the order or certificate of confirmation or make such other order or issue such certificate of confirmation as. in the opinion of the Chief Judge. is necessary In the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission." The Chief Judge granted Mr Banfield's application the net effect being that he was empowered to take title. It Is from that decision pursuant to 44/93 that this appeal Is bought by Mr Eruetl...

2. Compliance assurance and auditing policy 7 May 2021 [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................................ 7 1 Overview of Compliance and Auditing Overview About This document describes the Ministry of Justice’s (Ministry’s) compliance assurance and auditing processes for registered third party customers (Customers) of the Criminal Conviction History (CCH) Check Online Service. The Ministry’s auditing and compliance assurance processes i...

3. [2022] NZACC 171 — Cross v ACC (12 September 2022) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

4. [2022] NZACC 182 — Hodgson v ACC (20 September 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: 1 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801, (2017) 23 PRNZ 533. 3 (a)...

5. Tucker v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing Leave to Appeal) [2022] NZACC 220 [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: 1 Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801, (2017) 23 PRNZ 533. 3 (a)...

6. U Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 652 (27 November 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...2016. 8) The applicant says that interest should be chargeable as from when the relative invoices begin in 2016. I do not accept that. There has been massive, unexplained, delay on the part of the applicant. In terms of the substantial merits and justice of the matter, I intend awarding interest pursuant to the Interest on Money Claims Act on, net, $14,943.25, from the date of the filing of the claim in the Tribunal (14 December 2022) to today’s date. Whilst there was delay on the pa...

7. KQ v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 74 (24 February 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

8. Q Ltd v UL [2024] NZDT 129 (12 March 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. NE & TE v SS [2024] NZDT 586 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...paragraph 1 and I find that SS unlawfully caused damage to their property. I accept that the background was that SS had been performing work on the Applicants property and a dispute had arisen over the final payment. Regardless of the merits of that matter, I accept NE’s evidence that TE then saw SS stop his van outside their property. Then, after NE phoned SS and told him to stay off the property that she saw SS throw paint onto their driveway. I accept this was reported to Police. I al...

10. Summary of Submissions notification rules Privacy Act 2020 [pdf, 312 KB]

    .......................................................................................................... 6 List of submitters ...............................................................................................................11 https://ministryofjusticenz.sharepoint.com/sites/PolicyElectoralConstitutional/Privacy/Privacy%20Amendment%20Bill%202022/Briefings/03%20Transparency%20Amendments%20-%20Nov%202022/Final/Summary%20of%20Submissions%20-%20notification%20rules%20Privacy%20Act%2...