8476 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 51 READT 073/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PRADEEP JAIN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20007) First Respondent AND ANDREW AND ROBIN MARTIN Second Respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Ms C Sandelin – Member HEARD at Auckland on 4 Jun...
...greater alienation in section 216 where there is not just a personal benefit to the whanau or to the individual beneficiaries but the wider group, which under this order is not defined, becomes beneficiary. It is not fair under the rules of natural justice that the beneficiaries who were determined at that same sitting be immediately deprived of those interests, without consultation, by the vesting of the land in a trust for the benefit of others. The beneficiaries had no prior kno...
1 1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely...
...problem [7] Two issues arise [11] Case law to date [13] The powers of the Authority and the Court Particular provisions relating to the Employment Relations Authority Particular provisions relating to the Employment Court [22] [26] [28] Open justice is fundamental [36] The broader context [47] The relevance of privacy interests [56] The role of tikanga [62] The effect of publication [69] The relevance of confidential information/commercial realities [79] The evidential standa...
[bookmark: _GoBack] 2 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. ISBN 978-0-...
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release – Prisoner Voting Date of issue: 30 April 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the...
1 It’s All Relative: the Absolute Importance of the Family in Youth Justice (a New Zealand Perspective) Paper to be delivered at the World Congress on Juvenile Justice Geneva, Switzerland: 26-30 January 2015 by His Honour Judge Andrew Becroft1 Principal Youth Court Judge for New Zealand Te Kaiwhakawā Matua o te Kōti Taiohi...
...published.1 Before exercising its discretion the Court must be satisfied that there is an appropriate basis for doing so. That is because an order of non-publication, either interim or permanent, marks a departure from the fundamental principle of open justice. [4] An applicant must establish that sound reasons exist for the presumption to be displaced. This generally involves pointing to specific adverse consequences which would justify a departure from the principle of open ju...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 98262 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Nature of democracy and the evolution of democracy Thank you for your email of 10 August 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to the nature of democracy. Specifically, you requested: “…...
...Harrison QC, counsel for the plaintiffs, stated that he had recently become involved in the proceeding and had advised that an application for removal of the proceedings from the Authority to the Court should be made. He said this was because, as matters stood, there would be a common issue as to the circumstances of Ms Berry’s resignation which would arise in both the High Court proceeding and the Authority’s investigation meeting. The main ground for the application for remov...