8497 items matching your search terms
2017 Chief Judge’s MB 133 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU REGISTRY A20100012163 CJ 2010/62 UNDER Section 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rihi Hoone Pekama also known as Elizabeth Pekama or Rihi Hone Hamiora ROBYN ALANA FAITH DEER Applicant Judgment: 02 March 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC
...facts of the case to the court of the Registrar, cancel or amend the order of certificate of confirmation or make such other order or issue such certificate of confirmation as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [21] As outlined in Amos – Horahora 1A4B, 1A4E & 1A4F, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 contains provisions for review, rehearing and appeal that should be employed before recourse to s 45 applic...
...that whilst many firms make indemnity costs warnings as a matter of course, this firm does not do so. However, in the clear circumstances of this case we have been instructed to do so. We note this so that you and your client are fully aware of the matters.” [6] All of the complaints were considered by the National Standards Committee which determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, that no further action was necessary or appropriate having regard to...
...EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION AND ADVISORY SERVICE INCORPORATED [2024] NZEmpC 175 [17 September 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 79/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application that the Court determine a preliminary legal issue BETWEEN JACQUELINE SARAH HARTE Plaintiff...
...at an early stage may gain momentum at trial, whereas other claims which appeared strong at the outset are later revealed to be fatally flawed. [45] It is necessary to be cautious when approaching applications under s 112 in order to prevent injustice to claimants who may in fact have a good claim once all the evidence is before the Tribunal, including thorough cross-examination in appropriate cases. Too broad an approach to the jurisdiction under s 112 would involve a risk of injus...
...3 Counties Manukau District Health Board v Trembath [2001] ERNZ 847,at [9]; Jerram v Franklin Veterinary Services (1977) Ltd [2001] ERNZ 157 at [8]. 4 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd, at [24]. matters at issue in the non de novo challenge. It may be become necessary for the Court to make its own decision, as required by s 183 of the Act. 5 e) To succeed on a non de novo challenge, a plaintiff must establish one or more of the al
...strikes to proceed. For instance, the impact on other health professionals and on members of the public who need hospital care and allied health services at a time when those services are stretched, vulnerable, and at a crisis point. (c) Overall justice favours the grant of relief in light of all the circumstances, including the fact that urgent facilitation is scheduled for early next week. [24] Mr Cranney, counsel for the defendant, submitted in summary: (a) The PSA was e...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 12 Reference No: READT 028/2022 IN THE MATTER OF A referral for a compensation order under s 110(5) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 REFERRED BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 2104 BETWEEN KD and DX Complainants AND LEWIS DONALDSON Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) C A Sandelin (Deputy Chairperson) G J Denley (Member) Appearances: Couns...
Hon Kiri Allan Minister of Justice Proactive release - Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill Date of issue: 15 May 2023 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. No. Document Comments 1 Family Court (Family Court Associates) Released with some information withheld under Legislation Bill - Supplementary Order section 9(2)(f)(iv) of the OIA to protect the Paper confidentiality of advice tendered by...
...his defence in an amended statement of defence and to answer the interrogatories set out in the judgment, both within 30 days of the date of this judgment. B. The plaintiff’s application for the appointment of a special advocate to deal with matters of document disclosure, inspection and use is adjourned sine die pending further particularisation and explanation by the defendant of the documents which he objects to produce and have inspected by the plaintiff. If following such...