8497 items matching your search terms
...is inevitable that the same outcome would likely result from a new hearing. Therefore, it would be a poor use of the Court’s resources and the parties’ time to order a rehearing. If D Ltd believes that it has a claim against SE about other matters, then it can file proceedings in the appropriate venue. Referee: J P Smith Date: 23 November 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Par...
...Ltd) for the rebooking fees of (in total) $660.00. 3. The following issues require to be determined: (a) Did L Ltd provide its services with reasonable care and skill? (b) If there has been a breach, what remedy is appropriate? 4. As a matter of law QT, as the applicant in this proceeding, bears the burden of proof. He has to show that L Ltd breached its legal obligations to him. He has to do so on the balance of probabilities, i.e. as ‘more likely than not’. Did L L...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP v STACEY ROY [2023] NZEmpC 81 [2 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 40/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings E M P C IN THE MATTER OF EMPC 82/2023 a challenge to a determination of the E...
...scale is to be applied, then 3C is the most appropriate scale reflecting the complexity of the appellant’s case and commensurate with the 1 Accident Compensation Corporation v Hamilton [2019] NZHC 3109. appellant’s experience in legal matters. However, the appellant maintains that full costs be awarded, given the Corporation’s conduct in this matter. [10] I find that the appellant was put on notice by respondent’s Counsel on 13 February 2023 that the Corporation h...
...advised Mr Rossi at the time that deportation would not be enforced pending clarification of the status of his appeal to the Court of Appeal. INZ then agreed not to deport Mr Rossi pending determination of his proceedings in the High Court in this matter then scheduled for September 2014. [4] … The key issue [5] With the benefit of argument and the evidence, the central issue is: Whether Mr Rossi’s (allegedly) destitute circumstances, incarceration and the refusal to cons...
...REPRESENTATION: Dr J Bevan-Smith in person Mr RDH Massey for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 8 October 2024 2 (GCSB).” One NZ replied, advising that it was unable to confirm or deny its involvement in matters concerning law enforcement agencies. [2] Dr Bevan-Smith alleges this reply is a breach of Information Privacy Principle (IPP) 6 of the Privacy Act 2020 (PA) and an interference with his privacy. [3] One NZ denies that claim and say it ha...
RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice Next steps for the Search and Surveillance Act review Date 17 May 2021 File reference Action sought Timeframe Agree to start work on the Search and Surveillance Act review. By 31 May 2021 Agree officials will report back in October with the outcomes of early engagement and initial policy work with o...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 29 October 2024 Our ref: OIA 116160 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Porirua non-violence programmes Thank you for your email of 25 September 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (Ministry) requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information on Porirua non- violence programmes. Specifically, you reques...