Search Results

1. GE v M Ltd [2022] NZDT 86 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

2. LF & AS v NJ [2023] NZDT 36 (10 February 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...by AS or LF in writing or 21 day’s notice given by NJ in writing to either AS or LF if there are issues that NJ believes and has stated in writing to be anti-social or unacceptable flatmate behaviour. Parties agree to a weekly verbal check in on matters that need resolving/attending. In the event of selling the property, NJ will give AS and LF 90 days’ notice.” 4. On 19 October 2022, NJ gave AS two notices, one giving 21 days notice and the other giving 28 days notice on the b...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 102 C v P [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...obvious technological problems. I understand the subject judgments had been correctly loaded on the Employment Court platform for judgments and, at the time the joint application was made, not loaded on the other judicial websites. A Ministry of Justice information technology (IT) team ultimately advised the Court that there had been a third party anomaly which could be corrected administratively by the removal of the subject judgments from this Court’s website. Such a step would...

4. NX v HD [2024] NZDT 233 (28 March 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 58 Cunningham v HealthAlliance NZ Ltd. [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...obtained in the first instance.3 [6] The Court’s discretion is wide but must be exercised judicially and according to principle. In considering whether to order a stay, the overarching consideration is whether that would be in the interests of justice, taking into account various factors, including:4 2 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 180. 3 Grove v Archibald [1998] 2 ERNZ 125 (EmpC) at 128–129; Bathurst Resources Ltd v L&M Coal Holdings Ltd [2020] NZCA 186, (202...

6. NE & QE v LH [2024] NZDT 759 (7 November 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

7. BK & KK v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 405 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...the repair that had been done. [9] KK and BK have claimed a refund of the cost of the pump which was, allowing for a credit that was provided, $3,998.65. They also claim the costs that they incurred in travelling from [Town 1] to deal with the matter: mileage of 1,036 kms at $1.30 per km, a total of $$1,346.80; and time taken off work by KK, he being a [specialist] 14 hours at $90.00 per hour. They also request the cost of their travel to the hearing today. [10 ] At the hearing o...

8. BK & DT v P Ltd [2025] NZDT 265 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...breach of the CGA in relation to the damaged compressor and the damaged trims. I am satisfied that P Ltd has had an opportunity to repair both these issues and has failed to do so. BK and DT are entitled to damages which are the cost to have these matters attended to. 20. The quote from the [City 2] panel beater lists the following matters in relation to the compressor and trims: a. Remove and refit engine bay trim $24.00 b. Remove and refit air condenser $96.00 c. Parts – air...

9. COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey - Report 8 for the period 2 to 8 June 2020 [pdf, 760 KB]

   1 COVID-19 Justice Sector Survey Report 008 (2 June – 8 June 2020) This telephone survey provides information about how safe people feel and what crime and safety issues matter to them most. The report covers the following key topics: • Social connection and loneliness • Perceptions of safety, including reasons why people feel unsafe • Experience of some types of crimes (for example, fraud and COVID-19 related scam which are increasingly of concern internationally)...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 135 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Amcor Packaging [pdf, 111 KB]

    NZ AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING PRINTING & MANUFACTURING UNION INC V AMCOR PACKAGING (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 135 [21 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 135 ARC 9/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NZ AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING PRINTING & MANUFACTURING UNION INC Plaintiff AND AMCOR PACKAGING (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 14...