8020 items matching your search terms
...6 Attendance requirements 7 Supervision of the duty lawyer service 7 Payment 8 Travel time and mileage 9 Specific arrangements at courts with PDS Supervisors 10 Removal from the duty lawyer roster 10 Appendix 1 – Instructions on bail matters for duty lawyers in all district courts 11 Appendix 2 – Payment rates 13 4 July 2017 Duty lawyer service Introduction This policy describes the operation of the duty lawyer service. The object of the...
...6 Attendance requirements 7 Supervision of the duty lawyer service 7 Payment 8 Travel time and mileage 9 Specific arrangements at courts with PDS Supervisors 10 Removal from the duty lawyer roster 10 Appendix 1 – Instructions on bail matters for duty lawyers in all district courts 11 Appendix 2 – Payment rates 13 4 March 2017 Duty lawyer service Introduction This policy describes the operation of the duty lawyer service. The object of the duty lawyer s...
...6 Attendance requirements 7 Supervision of the duty lawyer service 7 Payment 8 Travel time and mileage 9 Specific arrangements at courts with PDS Supervisors 10 Removal from the duty lawyer roster 10 Appendix 1 – Instructions on bail matters for duty lawyers in all district courts 11 Appendix 2 – Payment rates 13 4 March 2017 Duty lawyer service Introduction This policy describes the operation of the duty lawyer service. The object of the duty lawyer...
...[2010] NZCA 429 at [24]; Koroniadis v Bank of New Zealand [2014] NZCA 197 at [19]. 2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 349 [23] The overarching consideration however, in determining whether to grant an extension of time, is where the interests of justice lie. 21 [24] As the Court in Matchitt v Matchitt noted, these principles have been applied in recent decisions of this Court involving applications for leave to appeal out of time. 22 Discussion [25] We note from the Court fi...
...These submissions will accordingly address those two issues. In doing so, the Commission will attempt to provide the Coroner with a human rights perspective as to where the scope of the inquiry should lie. The Commission does not seek to cover all matters raised or addressed by counsel representing participants to the inquiry. Issue One: Did the Royal Commission discharge the state’s obligation to undertake a rights compliant investigation? 4. The Commission submits that t...
E.64 AR (2020) Annual Report Te Tāhū o te Ture 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 In accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989, this Annual Report presents: Te Tāhū o te Ture - Ministry of Justice This document includes information about the Ministry’s operations and performance for the 2019/20 financial year. Joint Venture Business Unit – Family Violence and Sexual Violence (JVBU) The JVBU is hosted by the Ministry of Justice and provides a governance secretariat for the Joint V...
...resources and powers, should not be allowed to continually subject an individual to repressive and repeated prosecutions by the state. A citizen, once tried, is entitled to the comfort of knowing that once acquitted of an offence that is the end of the matter. It also protects the legal system by conserving judicial and prosecutorial resources and by reflecting the principle that there must be a degree of finality to the criminal justice process. The proposed exceptions outlined 7....
...July to 30 June released each year by the Ministry of Justice. Page 2 of 5 3. PROPOSALS FROM THE COMMITTEE Many of the questions raised have been traversed in the Portia’s early submissions. This submission only addresses matters that are new from the Committee’s report. Question 8: Do you have any other suggestions to improve the Family Justice System for Maori, including any comment on the examples provided? It is not out of the ordinary for whanau in...
I N C O N F I D E N C E Office of the Minister of Justice Office of the Minister of Local Government Chair, Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee Government response to the Justice Committee report Inquiry into the 2017 General Election and 2016 Local Elections Purpose 1. This paper seeks approval to table the attached government response to the Justice Select Committee’s Inquiry into the 2017 General Election and 2016 Local Elections. 2. It also seeks Cabinet’s in-principle a...
...nevertheless the rules around its composition and process, including the quorum and the requirement that it should provide written reasons for its decision, indicate that it is a decision-making body established by statute to which the rules of natural justice apply. the Supreme Court found that, in effect, the Benefits Review Committee decision is a departmental decision and the Benefits Review Committee is effectively acting in the Chief Executive’s stead. [21] This is reinforced...