Search Results

1. OIA-126086.pdf [pdf, 6.9 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 30 October 2025 Our ref: OIA 126086 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Documents relating to the number of victims of violent offending Thank you for your email of 18 September 2025 requesting information, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), relating to information provided by the Ministry of Justice to the Justice S...

2. [2020] NZEnvC 063 Wairakei Pastoral Limited [pdf, 212 KB]

   Page 1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 063 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND of potential appeals under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan AND of an application for waivers and directions under s 281 of the Act BY WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED AUCKLAND / WAIKATO & E...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 39 Alexander v Thorn [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...Act) states that a challenge must be filed within 28 days after the date of the Authority’s determination. However, pursuant to s 219 of the Act, the Court has jurisdiction to make orders extending time. The overriding consideration is the justice of the case. The following matters, where relevant, are material to the exercise of the discretion:3 (a) The reason for the omission to bring the case within time. (b) The length of the delay. (c) Any prejudice or hardship to any ot...

4. Employment Court AVL Guideline [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...all times; and (c) ensure the link is of sufficient quality for the participant to clearly see the hearing courtroom, be seen from that courtroom, to hear and be heard. [12] To ensure the proposed AVL equipment is compatible with the Ministry of Justice technology, and works satisfactorily, tests will be required to be conducted in advance, under the supervision of the Registrar. The number of tests, and the timing of them, will usually be determined by the Registrar. Generally,...

5. [2022] NZACC 102 – Anderson v ACC (31 May 2022) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...following principles to guide the exercise of the discretion to grant or deny an extension of time to lodge an appeal: [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

6. [2022] NZACC 109 - BD v ACC (8 June 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

7. [2022] NZACC 108–Scott v ACC [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...

8. LJ Ltd v DS Ltd [2022] NZDT 147 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...claim $4,370.00 including GST for the cost of repairs to the shed plus the Tribunal filing fee of $90.00. Mr P, Accounts Receivable Officer for LJ Ltd, reduced the claim at the first hearing to $4,370.00 only. DS Ltd deny the claim. 2. The matter had been adjourned after the first hearing on 28 June 2022 and was continued before me today. DS Ltd did not attend the hearing as there was no response to the phone number previously available for them. No further evidence or informati...

9. KN Ltd v UC [2022] NZDT 194 (24 May 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...which showed she owed a total of $863.83. The auctioneer’s administrative assistant on the day mistakenly entered $86.88 into the eftpos terminal instead of $868.83 which UC paid. 2. The auctioneer has made unsuccessful attempts to resolve the matter with UC, including engaging a debt collector. 3. UC disputes further payment on the basis that she queried the wrong amount at the time and was told it was correct. UC says that she has been advised that having paid the amount reque...

10. [2022] NZACC 119 – GG v ACC (27 June 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

    ...with the result that an extension of time should generally be granted, desirably without opposition from the respondent. [38] The ultimate question when considering the exercise of the discretion to extend time under r 29A is what the interests of justice require. That necessitates an assessment of the particular circumstances of the case. Factors which are likely to require consideration include: (a) The length of the delay. Clearly, the time period between the expiry of the appe...