Search Results

1. Hau v Ruddell - Oue 2B2B2 (2017) 162 Taitokerau MB 50 (162 TTK 50) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 provides the Court with jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions. The following issues arise: (a) Is there a serious question to be tried? (b) Where does the balance of convenience lie? (c) Where do the interests of justice lie? Is there a serious question to be tried? [4] It is accepted that Mr Ruddell is grazing cattle on the land. Mr Hau argues he is doing so without the consent of all owners. In his substantive application, Mr Hau seeks a perm...

2. Position description Deputy Chair HRRT Part time [docx, 23 KB]

   ...1993 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 after complaints have first been dealt with by the Human Rights Commission, the Privacy Commissioner and the Health and Disability Commissioner pursuant to their respective Acts. The principal matters considered by the Tribunal concern privacy issues, human rights, discrimination and health and disability issues. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to award various remedies including damages of up to $350,000. In proceedings under Part 1A of...

3. LCRO 26/2016 GX v BK (29 October 2018) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...professional standards issue that might possibly arise from the materials is the allegation that he shouted at her. The bare allegation is insufficient to support an adverse conduct finding on the balance of probabilities. [15] None of the other matters Ms GX raises are problematic in the context of the services Mr BK was providing to Ms GX. Lawyers routinely enter appearances for other counsel where interlocutory orders, such as timetabling, are sought by consent. There is n...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 25 Pilgrim v The Attorney-General [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...the interests implicated by the Warner Bros. application to attend the site visit and those of other media organisations. I agree that those differences are relevant to the balancing exercise when considering the application. 4 Ministry of Justice “4.0 Media in court” <justice.govt.nz>. 5 Pilgrim v Attorney-General (No 25) [2023] NZEmpC 17 at [7]. [7] I do not consider it appropriate to exercise my discretion to allow Warner Bros. to attend the site visit....

5. HRRT-Position-description-Deputy-Chair-2022 [docx, 25 KB]

   ...2020 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 after complaints have first been dealt with by the Human Rights Commission, the Privacy Commissioner and the Health and Disability Commissioner pursuant to their respective Acts. The principal matters considered by the Tribunal concern privacy issues, human rights, discrimination and health and disability issues. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to award various remedies including damages of up to $350,000. In proceedings under Part 1A...

6. HRRT-Position-description-Deputy-Chair-1December 2022 [docx, 25 KB]

   ...2020 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 after complaints have first been dealt with by the Human Rights Commission, the Privacy Commissioner and the Health and Disability Commissioner pursuant to their respective Acts. The principal matters considered by the Tribunal concern privacy issues, human rights, discrimination and health and disability issues. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to award various remedies including damages of up to $350,000. In proceedings under Part 1A...

7. PDLA nationwide holiday roster guidelines [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...throughout this period have been placed at the top of the lists for each region. Alternatively, if the call is in your area and you are able to attend in person, you can attend as normal. The guidelines on accessing whether to attend a PDLA matter face-to-face outlined on page 9 to 11 of the Ministry of Justice (PDLA Operational Policy) will need to be used to consider whether attendance in person in required. Where attendance in person is required by a local lawyer, you...

8. Tamihana v Saunders - Rangiuru 2G (2024) 318 Waiariki MB 76 (318 WAR 76) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...principles are settled in Lomax v Apatu – Awarua o Hinemaru Trust (2013) 22 Takitimu MB 282.1 The applicant must show: (a) There is a serious question to be tried; (b) The balance of convenience favours the applicant; and (c) The overall justice of the case supports the grant of an injunction. He pātai motuhake hei whakawā Is there a serious question to be tried? [12] Whether or not there is a serious question to be tried turns upon whether there is a tenable combinat...

9. Proactive release of Cabinet papers and minutes relating to supporting the delivery of the 2020 election due to the change of election date and COVID-19 [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Hon Kris Faafoi Minister of Justice Proactive release of Cabinet papers and minutes relating to supporting the delivery of the 2020 election due to the change of election date and Covid-19 Date of issue: 22 February 2021 The following document have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the...

10. Proactive-Release-Criminal-Procedure-Amendment-Rules-2025_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release - Criminal Procedure Amendment Rules 2025 Date of issue: 24 June 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identi...