8020 items matching your search terms
CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP v TONI MAHENO [2025] NZEmpC 26 [21 February 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 26 EMPC 2/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to dismiss proceeding for want of prosecution BETWEEN CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP Plaintiff AND TONI MA...
...Section 23 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – setting the maximum grant Section 28 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – relating to requests for an amendment to grant Section 29 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – withdrawal of legal aid – criminal matters Section 75 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – provide legal aid services Section 97 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – making a claim for payment Section 98 of the Legal Services Act 2011 – timeframe in which to make a claim f...
Restorative Justice Best Practice in New Zealand Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and...
Regulatory Impact Statement: identifying offenders attempting to unlawfully leave New Zealand Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options for obtaining biometric information (e.g. photographs) necessary to identify offenders unlawfully attempting to leave New Zealand. This objective reflects the Government’s interest, which arose from the recent case of prisoner Phillip John Sm...
...have concluded that the provisions of the Bill appear to be consistent with the rights and freedoms contained in the Bill of Rights Act. 22. In accordance with your instructions, we attach a copy of this opinion for referral to the Minister of Justice. Copies are also attached for referral to the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Conservation, and the Minister for the Environment if you agree. Boris van Beusekom Allison Bennett Senior Adviser Principal Legal A...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
...between the two entities was a contracting one, not an employer/employee relationship. IO Ltd bears no liability separately as it made no mistake or error, let alone one that would constitute negligence. IO Ltd therefore has no liability in this matter and the claim against it is dismissed. What are the reasonable losses suffered by KM and MM as a result of any negligence on the part of LC? 8. As the tree was not cut down, rather extensively pruned, it has not suffered irrevers...
...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...
...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...