Search Results

1. YCAP - community planning guide [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...offending statistics are going down. But challenges remain, such as making sure we turn young lives around at the earliest opportunity, and addressing the reasons why a disproportionately high number of young Māori get caught up in the youth justice system. Community action plans are a key way we can address such challenges. Because each community is different, each community’s action plan will be unique. Your plan may be quite a simple document and list only a few goals. Th...

2. McCallum v The Māori Trustee of Whanganui - Estate of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia [2014] Chief Judge's MB 541 (2014 CJ 541) [pdf, 215 KB]

   2014 Chief Judge’s MB 541 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20060027586 CJ 2008/30 UNDER Section 45 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Will of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia, otherwise known as Hipera Ngapiki, Hipera Waaka or Ngapiki Hakaraia BETWEEN CLARKE JAMES McCALLUM Applicant AND THE MĀORI TRUSTEE OF WHANGANUI Respondent Hearing: 21 October 2013 at 2013 Chief Judge's MB 970 21 Ma...

3. NP v KT [2021] NZDT 1706 (12 October 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...of the pruning and shaping to her trees and shrubs and what she sees as a loss of privacy due to the height her hedge and other plant were cut back too. The parties clearly have different views on the standard of the work done. In considering this matter I need to look to the evidence that supports the parties’ views. 23. In terms of the loss of privacy, NP has not provided any photographs supporting that the pruned height of the hedge or the camellia have caused her a loss of priva...

4. BE v W Ltd & KN [2024] NZDT 885 (15 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...Court. The total of the above costs is $42,880.50. BE claims $30,000 of that amount. BE does not claim any part of the legal costs associated with the District Court case. 10. BE, KN and CO (representing W Ltd) attended the two hearings of this matter in person at the [District Court]. Issues 11. The issues for the Tribunal to consider are: (a) Whether the Tribunal is prevented from hearing the claim by the provisions of S.11(5)(b) Disputes Tribunal Act; (b) Whether the Trib...

5. White v White - Mourea Papakainga 3E 14D1 Block (2011) 2011 Chief Judge's MB 280 (2011 CJ 280) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...WHITE MLC 2011 Chief Judge's MB 280 [9 September 2011] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 2011 Chief Judge's MB 280 (2011 CJ 280) A20070005338 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mourea Papakainga 3E 14D 1 block AND IN THE MATTER OF Martha Elizabeth White transferring to Patrick Rei White BETWEEN TE TARU WHITE Applicant AND PATRICK REI WHITE Respondent Hearing: 8 May 2009...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 056 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 663 KB]

   ...followed by the Council in either of its roles: The decision does not appear to be with the hearing documents on the Council's website (as most resource consent decisions usually are) but is available at: https:llcdn.newsie.co.nz/files/localmatters/Env Seawall Orewa Beach Esplanade Reserve Decisi on 30 November 2017.pdf 4 a) The proposed works which were the subject of the application could, with appropriate consent, be undertaken by the Council as the owner of the esplanade...

7. Hastie and Dredge TRI-2023-100-001 Procedural Order 4 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...say they cannot be criticised for matters outside their control and that a prejudice shared by all cannot provide sufficient grounds to justify the removal of any of the respondents. [42] The claimants conclude that it is in the interests of justice and is fair and appropriate for the fourth respondent to remain a party to the claim. The claimants say their delay was inordinate, but was excusable and did not result in significant prejudice to the parties. Furthermore, the claima...

8. FINAL Restorative Justice Survey Report September 2021 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   Ministry of Justice - Restorative Justice Survey Victim Satisfaction Survey 2021 Report Prepared by GravitasOPG For Ministry of Justice September 2021 Ministry of Justice • 2021 Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey Report • Page 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary 2 2. Introduction and methodology 7 2.1. Background 7 2.2. Restorative justice survey 7 2.3. Interview method, length and response rate 8 2.4. Limitations 8 3. Key Me

9. Regulatory impact statement: Review of family violence legislation [pdf, 300 KB]

   1 Review of family violence legislation: Regulatory impact statement Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory impact statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options for strengthening legislation to better respond to family violence in New Zealand. Key constraints are set out below. 2. Focus on regulatory change: The scope of the review is strengthening family violence legislation. Overall, this restricted the consideration...

10. AN v DH LCRO 119/2015 (23 December 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...conduct decision on which the decision on review is founded because Ms DH filed that in June 2014. [17] At the hearing on 13 February 2014 Ms AN cross-examined Ms DH and TH, and led evidence from the paternal grandmother and stepfather. [18] The matter was adjourned part-heard from 13 February 2014 to 7 April 2014 to allow the Court to attend to issues which had expanded from MM’s father’s application for contact to incorporate proceedings commenced by Ms DH against MM’s father...