Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8020 items matching your search terms

  1. [2015] NZEmpC 228 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [pdf, 177 KB]

    IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 228 EMPC 112/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS UNION INC Plaintiff AND SOUTH PACIFIC MEATS LIMITED First Defendant AND MICHAEL ANTHONY TALLEY Second Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 30 September, 27 October...

  2. AM v ZM LCRO 48 / 2010 (25 February 2011) [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...power to take no further action on a complaint if, in the opinion of the Standards Committee, it is unnecessary or inappropriate to do so. [2] The Practitioner acted for the Applicant‟s husband in respect of matrimonial and property relationship matters. When the Applicant applied for interim maintenance, the Practitioner appeared on her client‟s behalf to oppose the application. The application was declined by the Court. 2 Complaint [3] The complaint was that...

  3. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

    ...When granting leave to appeal out of time, we were satisfied that the appeal was not a hopeless case and there was utility in hearing argument on the substantive issues. [18] We agree with Dr Gilling, counsel for Mr Karena, that the appeal raises matters of public importance regarding the use of the Court’s discretionary powers granting confirmation of an alienation, and the protection of the rights of the PCA. These are matters that go to the heart of the principles to be applie...

  4. Proactive-release-Increasing-revenue-from-courts-and-tribunal-fees-_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 650 KB]

    Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release - Increasing revenue from courts and tribunal fees Date of issue: 03 July 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has be...

  5. AU v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2023] NZACC 182 [pdf, 419 KB]

    NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME AND OCCUPATION OF APPELLANT PROHIBITED BY S 160 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 SEE Minute 19 March 2024 at end of judgment IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 182 ACR 257/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AU Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 May 2023

  6. Official Assignee v IL LCRO 197/15 (24 May 2016) [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...Standards Committee to consider those matters and take such actions (or not) as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate. [12] I am conscious of the judgment of the High Court in C v LCRO where Dobson J found there had been a breach of natural justice by the LCRO in not providing the applicant lawyer with warning that the LCRO was contemplating returning an issue to the Standards Committee for consideration.6 5 Email EF to SA (20 Dec...

  7. Eichelbaum report [pdf, 441 KB]

    ...3 9.3 Dr Sas’s opinion 9.4 My comments 10. Terms of Reference (1)(c) (the nature & extent of risk to which any breaches of best practice give rise) 10.1 Interviews 10.2 Contamination 11. Terms of Reference (3) (whether any matters which give rise to doubts about assessment of children’s evidence to an extent which would render convictions unsafe and warrant grant of pardon) 11.1 The nature of this Inquiry 11.2 The test to be applied 11.3 Whether doubts render...

  8. ABS Ltd v ZYL and ZYK [2013] NZDT 36 (15 March 2013) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...postponing commencement of the limitation period. Finally, s 31 appears to relate to equitable remedies and is irrelevant. [21] I have considered FG’s view that s 18(6) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 permits the Tribunal to rule on matters outside the six-year limitation period. That subsection requires me to determine the dispute on its substantial merits and justice having regard to the law. I bear in mind as well that, absent the limitation issue, ABS Ltd appeared to...

  9. [2020] NZREADT 36 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1904 v Bright (24 August 2020) [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...evidence regarding the relevant events. She submitted that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to make the ruling sought, in accordance with its ability to regulate its own procedure, as set out in s 105 of the Act, and that it is in the interests of justice to do so. [6] Ms Mok acknowledged that Mr Bright is not obliged to retain counsel, and that the Tribunal must ensure that natural justice is dispensed. She also acknowledged that the Tribunal has no express power to appoint an...

  10. AJ v IO Ltd & TF Ltd [2021] NZDT 1692 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...