Search Results

1. Final Process Evaluation for the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court 2016 [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   1 Final Process Evaluation for the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Te Whare Whakapiki Wairua Prepared for: Ministry of Justice 17 August 2016 2 Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. Evaluat

2. Victims of crime in the adult criminal justice system: a stocktake of the literature [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Commissioned by Ministry of Justice Victims of crime in the adult criminal justice system: A stocktake of the literature by Dr Elaine Mossman October 2012 Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... i Structure of the report ....................................................................................................... vi Part one: In

3. Bayne - Great Barrier Island [2016] Chief Judge's MB 764 (2016 CJ 764) [pdf, 451 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 764 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140012567 CJ 2014/42 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Great Barrier Island (all the islands and rock outcrops in the environs of Aotea) ERANA HEMOATA BAYNE Applicant Judgment: 22 August 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s...

4. Mr D v REAA [2013] NZREADT 36 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...interest need to know that it was the applicant who was involved in the incident and that there is a countervailing need to protect third-party family interests. He submits that the applicant has suffered sufficient penalty to date and that open justice may be served by an appropriate form of prohibition which does not lead to the applicant’s identification. [14] It is submitted by Ms MacGibbon for the Authority that there are no grounds raised by the licensee which trump the presump...

5. Notes from Crown Maori Relations Regional Hui at Hokianga on 13 April 2018 [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...Relations Deborah Mahuta-Coyle, Senior Ministerial Advisor to Hon Davis Tihema Baker, Private Secretary, Crown/Māori Relations Te Rau Kupenga, Crown Facilitator Officials from: • the Crown/Māori Relations Roopu, Te Tāhū o te Ture / Ministry of Justice; • Te Puni Kōkiri. These notes provide a broad overview of the key points raised by participants and are not minutes of the hui. The headings used in this note correlate with the information contained in the pamphlet...

6. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui in Hokianga on 13 April 2018 [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...Relations Deborah Mahuta-Coyle, Senior Ministerial Advisor to Hon Davis Tihema Baker, Private Secretary, Crown/Māori Relations Te Rau Kupenga, Crown Facilitator Officials from: • the Crown/Māori Relations Roopu, Te Tāhū o te Ture / Ministry of Justice; • Te Puni Kōkiri. These notes provide a broad overview of the key points raised by participants and are not minutes of the hui. The headings used in this note correlate with the information contained in the pamphlet...

7. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Hokianga 13 April 2018 [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...Relations Deborah Mahuta-Coyle, Senior Ministerial Advisor to Hon Davis Tihema Baker, Private Secretary, Crown/Māori Relations Te Rau Kupenga, Crown Facilitator Officials from: • the Crown/Māori Relations Roopu, Te Tāhū o te Ture / Ministry of Justice; • Te Puni Kōkiri. These notes provide a broad overview of the key points raised by participants and are not minutes of the hui. The headings used in this note correlate with the information contained in the pamphlet...

8. QI v PH & DN [2021] NZDT 1300 (10 February 2021) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. DX & SX v TZ [2021] NZDT 1687 (27 May 2021) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. QN v NI [2023] NZDT 128 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...