Search Results

1. OO v QP [2023] NZDT 70 (20 February 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

2. YI v CU Ltd [2023] NZDT 545 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

3. CL & NN v BT & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 200 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

4. CX & EB v TK [2023] NZDT 342 (31 May 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. SX v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 788 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...hour and the temperature gauge not moving. 11. [Mechanic 1] is the only one of the report authors that actually dismantled the motor and made their assessment after removing the cylinder head. SX’s words and terminology have clearly complicated matters. I have listened to SX over many hours of hearing and I have questioned him in depth. SX is neither a lawyer nor a person whose work requires him to assess every word before he makes a statement. I found SX to be a person who took great...

6. BI v ID [2024] NZDT 806 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...found ID to be liable, I award BI the sum of $12,368.98 (market value + towing fee - less wreck sale). 16. For these reasons, I find ID is liable to pay BI the sum of $12,368.98 as ordered above. I consider the sum awarded meets the merits and justice of the dispute. Referee: Unasa Date: 13 September 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from be...

7. NC v UD Ltd [2024] NZDT 829 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

8. TD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 761 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. P Ltd v V Ltd [2024] NZDT 377 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. OIA-Letter to chief executive regarding convention against torture. [pdf, 937 KB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 15 November 2024 Ref: OIA 116431 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Document Thank you for your request of 4 October 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), a copy of a letter written to Ministry Chief Executives. Specifically, y...