8033 items matching your search terms
...pleadings in the challenge to the substantive determination, no further steps were required to challenge the costs determination. [6] The Court has jurisdiction to extend the time within which a challenge may be filed if doing so is in the interests of justice. The factors usually considered include the reason for the omission to challenge the determination within time, the length of 2 At [2]. 3 At [7]. 4 At [114] relying on Cabl...
justice.govt.nz LEGAL AID NEWS June 2017 Legal Aid News is your official regular communication from Legal Aid Services on all matters related to legal aid. Legal Aid News is generally published in the last week of every month. IN THIS ISSUE … Update on changes to the administration of legal aid Criminal fixed fee review – second set of changed Views sought on greater use of on-site audits for legal aid providers Processing of duty lawyer and police detention legal assi...
...Schedule B (excl. GST) Schedule C (excl. GST) Sentencing reports/submissions Expert witness reports 150.00 150.00 150.00 Section 38 – forensic report 150.00 150.00 150.00 Restorative justice report 150.00 150.00 150.00 Written sentencing submissions 250.00 250.00 250.00 (Interlocutory) Appeals to the High Court Appeal against disclosure decision (s33(3)(b) Crim...
...(unopposed) – preparation of submissions Sentencing report – Written expert witness/report Sentencing report – Section 38 forensic report Sentencing report – Restorative justice report Sentencing report – Alcohol and drug report Sentencing report – Other court ordered report Written sentencing submissions
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz Ref: OIA 108840 23 January 2024 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Race Relations Commissioner Thank you for your email of 20 December 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information about the selection of the Race Relations Commis...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 25 October 2024 Our ref: OIA 116446 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Resource Management Act offences Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) of 23 September 2024, seeking information concerning fines under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: I f...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 25 October 2024 Our ref: OIA 116446 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Resource Management Act offences Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) of 23 September 2024, seeking information concerning fines under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: I f...
...by it to have been delivered “On the papers” (I assume without an investigation meeting) although there is evidence of a number of telephone conference calls involving the parties’ representatives and the Authority Member. These and other matters will need to be addressed at the substantive hearing of the challenge. They include the puzzling and contradictory references in the body of the determination to Richmond seeking “a permanent injunction” against Ms Bracewell (at [...
...if there has been an amendment to a relevant statute or regulation or a new judicial decision of relevance; [b] if counsel have failed to alert the Court to a relevant legislative provision or decision; or [c] if “for some very special reason justice requires that the judgment be recalled”. 3 [9] In Svitzer Salvage BV v Z Energy Limited & Anor [2013] NZHC 354, Goddard J held as follows: “[16] Against that context, I refer to the leading statement of Wild CJ in...
...(the Committee) to take no further action on his complaint dated 26 June 2023 about the professional conduct of the respondent. Background [2] Both the applicant and the respondent are lawyers practising in the criminal courts. Both had client matters to attend to in the District Court list on a particular day. [3] The court building has a lawyers’ room and three client interview rooms. During a 15-minute court break, the applicant entered an empty interview room to eat a sand...