LCRO 319/2013 RA v ZA (27 June 2017) [pdf, 101 KB]
...He relies for support on his experience in a complaint process in which he laid complaint against another practitioner. That Committee adopted a different approach. He considers the process and decision under review evidence a lack of natural justice, bias, predetermination, illogicality and incompetence on the Committee’s part. He believes the Committee side-stepped the professional standards issue and misdirected itself. [5] Based on his suspicion there was covert communica...