Search Results

1. EN v CQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 51 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...with the actual carrier after hearing from EN, GQ Ltd may have been able to establish whether the carrier went back to collect the TV. This would have given EN opportunity to track who came to his home to collect the TV. GQ Ltd did not follow up this matter because it believed it had no liability, the contract being at owner’s risk. 11. From the evidence I am satisfied that GQ Ltd has caused a loss for EN. The loss is the amount he paid for the TV and the cartage that he did not h...

2. MT v UI [2022] NZDT 54 (9 May 2022) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...the melted points at a consistent rough distance off the hedge line. S’s opinion was that the use of a hedge cutter would “be the culprit to melting the grass in the spots”. 8. Evidence from T Ltd, the loss adjuster used by X Ltd in this matter, is also consistent with the damage being caused by the hedge trimmers. That report concludes that the cause of the damage is heat from the motor of a petrol trimmer and that the damage is consistent with the event described by the insur...

3. X Ltd v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 104 (9 March 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

4. MI v EG [2023] NZDT 194 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

5. US Ltd v NH [2021] NZDT 1545 (16 September 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

6. DN & EN v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 725 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

7. II & SC v FX [2022] NZDT 229 (19 July 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

8. LU v LBI [2024] NZDT 119 (2 April 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. Notice of Appeal - Residence Class Visa Appeal - Form 1 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...MUST be signed by every person included in the appeal aged 17 years or older. This authorisation is valid for the duration of the appeal before Immigration and Protection Tribunal. 1. I authorise the Tribunal to seek information from the Ministry of Justice and/or the New Zealand Police about my criminal record and/or any complaints, charges or investigations. I authorise the Ministry of Justice and/or the New Zealand Police to provide this information to the Tribunal. 2. Any informati...

10. MS & NS v JT [2024] NZDT 238 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...