Search Results

1. EF v TB [2024] NZDT 617 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

2. U Ltd v KG Ltd [2024] NZDT 477 (6 June 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

3. Q Ltd v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 437 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

4. E Ltd v KC [2024] NZDT 443 (27 May 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...changed their minds about who they considered to be liable for the damage. 17. Secondly, even if KC relied on any representation by J Ltd, I do not consider that he suffered any loss by doing so. KC said he would have got a lawyer and taken the matter to court if he had not received the email on 13 July 2023. 18. However, KC had not lost the opportunity to pursue the issue of loss or damage against E Ltd and J Ltd. Those issues could properly be raised as part of the current clai...

5. XH v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 410 (2 May 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

6. XM v MK & NK [2024] NZDT 559 (5 August 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...when NK was involved in the sale and did not stop the sale. That said, I accept NK did not want to sell the boat but by his actions, as a half owner, he consented to the sale of the boat. Any dispute about the distribution of the sale proceeds is a matter completely separate to the sale and XM’s rightful ownership of [Boat]. Is XM entitled to reject the boat and receive a refund of the $22,000.00 he paid for the boat? 12. Section 37 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 allow...

7. T Ltd v EO [2024] NZDT 814 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

8. Tackling money laundering and terrorist financing

   ...covered by the Reserve Bank or Financial Markets Authority. AML-CFT Homepage Other government agencies involved in the regime include: The Ministry of Justice which is responsible for policy development and administration of the law. It also handles all matters related to exemptions from the Act. The New Zealand Police financial intelligence unit receives and analyses suspicious transaction reports.  It also issues guidance to reporting agencies and the three supervisors about reporting...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives

9. JK v OC LCRO 254/2013 (10 February 2015) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...regulatory bodies including the Police, the Independent Police Conduct Authority, the Police Disciplinary Tribunal, and the Solicitor-General. Further, Mr JK alleged that Mr OC’s cumulative actions amounted to an attempt to pervert the course of justice. [9] Mr OC’s conduct was the subject of a police investigation. In July 2009, that investigation concluded that:2 There is no evidence to support [Mr JK’s] complaint of criminal misconduct against Mr OC or the six police o...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 30 Stonewood Group Ltd v VGP [pdf, 150 KB]

    STONEWOOD GROUP LIMITED v VGP [2024] NZEmpC 30 [26 February 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 30 EMPC 310/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an adjournment BETWEEN STONEWOOD GROUP LIMITED Plaintiff AND VGP Defendant Hearing: On the papers...