8020 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZREADT 6 Reference No: READT 012/2021 IN THE MATTER OF An application for review of a Registrar’s decision under s 112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PETER LAWRENCE Applicant AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) C Sandelin (Deputy Chair) N O’Connor (Member) Representation: The applicant: B Walker...
...test the content of the Bill; the presence of certain significant powers or features in the Bill that might be of particular Parliamentary or public interest and warrant an explanation. This disclosure statement was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry of Justice certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and understanding, the information provided is complete and accurate at the date of finalisation below. Andrea King Acting General Manager, Courts and Justice...
...who have NCEA exams to prepare for and sit at the end of this year. 3 [8.6] In summary the case is that the prejudice likely to arise from publication exceeds mere embarrassment or detriment to reputation and outweighs the principle of open justice and any genuine pre-hearing public interest in this matter. Basis of opposition [9] Ms Beauchamp filed a notice of opposition dated 13 September 2019 supported by an affirmation by Pamela Rowe of the same date. It is submitted: [9.1]...
...orders.5 While I delivered a minority judgment in the case, it is appropriate to apply the majority’s approach, which can be summarised as follows. 2 At [8]. 3 At [8]-[9]. 4 MW v Spiga Ltd [2024] NZEmpC 147. 5 At [91]. [7] Open justice is of fundamental importance and may only be departed from to the extent necessary to serve the ends of justice.6 Ordinarily, the Court will only order non-publication where there is reason to believe that specific adverse consequen...
...considering an application to re-open in the Authority. However, in my view those cases provide a useful framework that can readily be applied by way of analogy. And at the end of the day the overriding consideration must be the interests of justice, having regard to the likelihood of a miscarriage of justice balanced against other relevant factors such as the importance of finality in litigation. In Ports of Auckland Limited v NZ Waterfront Workers Union, 4 a full Court of the...
...Court failed to give proper notice of the hearing that led to the 2004 decision. Second, the 2004 decision failed to take into account material considerations, including the evidence relied on in earlier Court decisions. Third, the interests of justice require that the appeal be allowed. Kōrero whānui - Background The 1961 order - Succession to Mere Hare Kerepeti [3] Mere Hare Kerepeti (‘Mere Kerepeti’) died at Pipiwai on 4 August 1961, leaving no will. She was married to...
...provide further particulars regarding the appellant’s receipt of notice of the Māori Land Court proceedings. That memorandum was filed on 22 January 2018. Legal principles - Notice [4] It is well established that the principles of natural justice require that notice must be given to anyone who may be affected. This is so that such persons can appear and be heard.2 In Tioro v McCallum – Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia this Court underscored the need for notice:3 [20] It is a fund...
...exercise of a broad discretion. [3] The In-Court Media Guidelines 2016 (Media Guidelines) have been developed to assist.1 Those guidelines set out a number of principles which are relevant. The key underlying principle is the promotion of open justice. Other principles must also be weighed in the mix, including the need for a fair trial; the principle that the media has an important role in the reporting of trials as the “eyes and ears of the public”; and the interests, reaso...
...(Remote Participation) Amendment Act 2016.Within the body of the Act remote participation and audio-visual services are referred to as AVL (audio-visual links). The Act establishes the presumption that AVL is to be used for criminal procedural matters where the participant is in custody and remote participation facilities are available. This presumption only explicitly applies 2 and is limited to participants held in custody and does not include other participants of heari...
Statement of Intent 2011 – 2014 E.64 SOI (2011) 1 Table of Contents Introduction from the Minister of Justice 1 Introduction from the Chief Executive 2 Who we are 3 Our responsibilities 4 Our sector outcomes 4 What we will do 5 Our performance framework 6 Making communities safer 8 Maintaining the integrity and improving the 9 responsiveness of the justice system Maintaining the civil and democratic rights of New Zealanders 11 How we work 13 Fewer, faster, fit for purp...