8027 items matching your search terms
WATTS & HUGHES CONSTRUCTION LIMITED v PHILIP DE BUYZER [2019] NZEmpC 79 [1 July 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 79 EMPC 418/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for non-publication orders BETWEEN WATTS & HUGHES CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Plaintiff
...Inquiry chaired by the Rt Hon Sir Owen Woodhouse. Functions and responsibilities Everyone in New Zealand is covered by ACC’s no-fault scheme if they’re injured in an accident. This includes children, beneficiaries and students. It doesn’t matter if they’re working, unemployed or retired. It also includes visitors to New Zealand. In return, people do not have the right to sue for compensation for personal injury, other than for exemplary damages. A person injured as a result o...
...Inquiry chaired by the Rt Hon Sir Owen Woodhouse. Functions and responsibilities Everyone in New Zealand is covered by ACC’s no-fault scheme if they’re injured in an accident. This includes children, beneficiaries and students. It doesn’t matter if they’re working, unemployed or retired. It also includes visitors to New Zealand. In return, people do not have the right to sue for compensation for personal injury, other than for exemplary damages. A person injured as a result o...
...Inquiry chaired by the Rt Hon Sir Owen Woodhouse. Functions and responsibilities Everyone in New Zealand is covered by ACC’s no-fault scheme if they’re injured in an accident. This includes children, beneficiaries and students. It doesn’t matter if they’re working, unemployed or retired. It also includes visitors to New Zealand. In return, people do not have the right to sue for compensation for personal injury, other than for exemplary damages. A person injured as a result o...
...Inquiry chaired by the Rt Hon Sir Owen Woodhouse. Functions and responsibilities Everyone in New Zealand is covered by ACC’s no-fault scheme if they’re injured in an accident. This includes children, beneficiaries and students. It doesn’t matter if they’re working, unemployed or retired. It also includes visitors to New Zealand. In return, people do not have the right to sue for compensation for personal injury, other than for exemplary damages. A person injured as a result o...
...of Business, Innovation and Employment [2018] NZEmpC 31. 2 Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2016] NZERA Auckland 420. allegations with the Authority during the investigation into the substantive matters and participated in the subsequent investigation when the penalties were imposed. [6] In a judgment of this Court dated 30 March 2017, the issue of representation in respect of these challenges was considered.3 That decision informs...
KELLY MCBRIDE v ANZCO FOODS LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 234 [18 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 178/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KELLY MCBRIDE Applicant AND ANZCO FOODS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the p...
...(f) the public interest in the proceeding; and (g) the overall balance of convenience. [6] Other factors, including the likely merits of any related challenge, can also be relevant.10 Ultimately, the overarching consideration is the interests of justice. Affidavits and submissions have been filed [7] Mr Berryman’s evidence in support of his application is brief. He merely confirms that he previously worked for Fonterra, that he has raised a personal grievance against it, and...
...Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA). [10] As executor and trustee, Mr EL was the defendant in all of the proceedings. [11] Mr EL instructed counsel to act in the PRA proceedings, and separate counsel to act in the FPA proceedings. [12] Matters were finally resolved by 2018. [13] Over the course of administering Mr OM’s estate, Mr EL issued invoices totalling $105,318.75 (GST inclusive). 3 The complaint [14] The Vs lodged their complaint against Mr EL in an email to t...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 126 Ref: LCRO 103/2021 LCRO 058/2022 LCRO 104/2021 LCRO 105/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GS Applicant AND AND BETWEEN AND AND BETWEEN AND ABC LTD and HY Responden