Search Results

1. LT v NS [2023] NZDT 277 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

2. NI & QI v SB [2024] NZDT 60 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

3. ET v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 109 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

4. QQ v IK & YM [2023] NZDT 357 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. FT v MU & T Ltd & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 470 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

6. TN v HD [2023] NZDT 468 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...and building on HD’s property. f. HD has provided some evidence of damage to the driveway resulting from stormwater from TN’s property concentrated and directed via the novacoil pipe. Solving this problem would be a relatively straightforward matter of extending the pipe to a lower point beyond the driveway. The current, inadequate, arrangement is an “act or omission” by TN that is causing damage to the driveway. However, HD’s counter-claim seeks the cost of digging out, r...

7. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...especially in a domestic arrangement, that there was a mutual intention to create legal relations, that there were binding terms, and that the act done was in consideration of a promise to do or not do something in return. The onus of establishing these matters rests respectively on the party making the claim or the counterclaim. 7. BB acknowledged that AA gave him money to purchase the items claimed, with some minor discrepancies in the costs. However, his position was that these were...

8. SQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 513 (6 August 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. KU v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 876 (15 September 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. BI v O Inc [2024] NZDT 725 (21 October 2024) [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...these ideas is “unprofessional” – it is only clear that he does not agree with it and that some statements may have conveyed stereotypes or assumptions not founded in scientific study. I also note that he draws attention only to a small number of matters and that O Inc carries out a far broader range of services. In the context of the whole, I am not satisfied that these instances mean the statement that O Inc is New Zealand’s leading professional association for [redacted] practit...