Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC AC 67/06 Bowles v Raukura Hauora O Tainui [pdf, 19 KB]

   BOWLES V RAUKURA HAUORA O TAINUI AK AC 67/06 30 November 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 67/06 ARC 50/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to file statement of defence out of time BETWEEN LINDA MARGARET BOWLES Plaintiff AND RAUKURA HAUORA O TAINUI Defendant Hearing: 30 November 2006 (Heard at Auckland by telephone conference) Appearances: Simon...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 54 Hong v Auckland Transport [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...entitled to tell members of the public to stop swearing at him and to advise them that it is against the law. The facilitator also found Mr Hong’s views and communication style concerning. It is the conduct at the workshop that precipitated matters with AT that ultimately led to Mr Hong’s dismissal. Mr Hong was asked to go home On 26 January 2017, Mr Bidgood met with Mr Hong. Mr Bidgood and Mr Hong view the discussion that followed differently. Mr Bidgood says that, bef...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 88 Merennage v Ritchies Transport Holdings Ltd [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...proceedings. [4] It appears that non-publication in relation to the complainant’s name and identifying details was dealt with on an agreed basis in the Authority. 2 Mr Merennage consents to the present application. [5] Having considered the matters raised in support of the application, and after hearing from counsel, I am satisfied that it is appropriate that an interim order be made. At this stage I do not consider that there is a countervailing public interest in...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 148 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL ON NON-PUBLICATION [1] Notices of discontinuance of proceedings have been filed by the plaintiffs in respect of all causes of action brought against each defendant on file EMPC 150/2017. The Court is advised that all matters have been resolved, and there are no issues as to costs between the parties. [2] The plaintiffs also seek orders permanently sealing the Court’s file on the proceedings which are before it; and for orders that the inte...

5. Brown v Otago Polytechnic (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...first teleconference was the question of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction over some of the complaints made by Mr Brown in the statement of claim. The Minute of 23 May 2013, after recording that the Tribunal has jurisdiction only in relation to those matters made the subject of complaint to the Human Rights Commission, noted that some of the breaches alleged in the statement of claim had not been so complained about. To clarify what matters had been the subject of complaint Mr Brown was dir...

6. Fehling v Ministry of Health (Strike-Out of Second Defendant) [2016] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Health Information Privacy Statement and have read it, with following limitation: The MOH must not receive personal details and an identification NHI number as this would result in criminal fascistic-corrupt government mates overriding all privacy matters by “guarding” the liquor cabinet. The DHB can issue such a number NHI! [8] Subsequently, by letter dated 18 April 2015, Mr Fehling made inquiry of the Ministry of Health as to the information it held about him. The Ministry by le...

7. LCRO 54/2018 KJ v VW (6 July 2018) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...law and administration of justice, and lawyers’ overriding duties to the High Court. 9 (c) Another lawyer’s client(s) [29] Where one lawyer’s client complains about the conduct of a lawyer who acts for a client on the opposing side of a matter or transaction, depending on the particular circumstances, those of the rules in the second and third categories which might be relevant include: (a) to uphold the rule of law (r 2); (b) a lawyer’s overriding duty to the Court (r...

8. Kapua - Estate of Ngamotu Paora [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1162 (2019 CJ 1162) [pdf, 389 KB]

   2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1162 THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20140009320 CJ 2014/24 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Paora te Hiko also known as Ngamotu Paora or Te Koti Paora CONCERNING IVY WAITANGI KAPUA Applicant Hearing: 14 May 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 704-718 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 4 November 2019 FURTHER DIRECTION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX

9. [2020] NZEmpC 2 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...has a good arguable case; b) that the defendants have assets within the jurisdiction; c) that there is a real risk that the property will be moved out of the jurisdiction or dissipated; and d) that the balance of convenience and interests of justice require the order to be granted. [30] The present application does not raise issues in respect of the first three criteria. Rather, it relates to the balance of convenience and interest of justice, particularly as it affe...

10. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 53 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 481 KB]

    ...interlocutory process well before hearings commence. There are five main steps to this process, each marked by judicial conferences. 1. An early conference sets out a district boundary and establishes which claimants are going to be heard. These matters were resolved for Gisborne in May 2000. 2. The research for the casebook is defined and a dead- line set for the completion of all research reports. With a few exceptions all research was completed for Gisborne in January 2001. 3. All...