Search Results

1. EL v CF Ltd [2022] NZDT 81 (30 March 2022) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

2. AI YK v LS [2021] NZDT 1709 (7 December 2021) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

3. SS v SH [2022] NZDT 230 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

4. 20240624-Education-and-Training-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...the responsible Minister the nature and extent (including monetary value, if quantifiable) of all interests that 1 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. the person has at that time, or is likely to have, in matters relating to the statutory entity. 11. These provisions are necessary for the efficient and effective operation of the education sector and the charter schools. Accordingly, we consider that any limits on freedom of expression in the...

5. BORA-Advice-Education-and-Training-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...to the responsible Minister the nature and extent (including monetary value, if quantifiable) of all interests that 1 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. the person has at that time, or is likely to have, in matters relating to the statutory entity. 11. These provisions are necessary for the efficient and effective operation of the education sector and the charter schools. Accordingly, we consider that any limits on freedom of expression in the...

6. NX v T Ltd & S Ltd [2024] NZDT 234 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...confirmed that S Ltd fits that definition, as they import and distribute tapware that is manufactured overseas by a business that does not have a place of business in New Zealand. As such, S Ltd is considered a manufacturer for the purposes of this matter. There was no issue as to whether T Ltd was a supplier. Was the kitchen tap of acceptable quality and fit for purpose? 4. Section 7 of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (“CGA”) provides that goods are of acceptable quality...

7. BC v KQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 146 (15 April 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

8. XN v LD & S Ltd [2023] NZDT 62 (17 January) 2023 [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. TD v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 718 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. NH Ltd v OZ Ltd [2023] NZDT 396 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...