Search Results

1. Q Ltd v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 853 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

2. DH & MX v SL [2024] NZDT 287 (30 March 2024) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

3. NS v TN & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 544 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

4. TN v SH [2024] NZDT 569 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

5. Lawyer-for-Subject-Person.-Selection-Appointment-and-Other-Matters.pdf [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...1.1 The terms of this practice note have been settled in consultation with the Ministry of Justice (Ministry) and the Family Law Section (FLS) of the New Zealand Law Society (Law Society). 2 CONTENTS 2.1 The practice note covers the following matters: (a) Purpose (b) Terms and definitions (c) Representation of a subject person (d) Process for appointment in any specific case (e) Reports of lawyer for subject person (f) Process and criteria for appointment to the lawyer for...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 88 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 321 KB]

   PETER D’ARCY LORIGAN v INFINITY AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 88 [1 August 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 88 EMPC 377/2015 EMPC 277/2016 EMPC 215/2017 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder BETWEEN PETER D’ARCY LORIGAN Plaintiff AND INFIN...

7. Talking about sentences & crime: views of people on periodic detention [pdf, 746 KB]

   Talking about sentences and crime: The views of people on periodic detention Wendy Searle Trish Knaggs Kiri Simonsen July 2003 ii iii First published in July 2003 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 478-20163-x iv Foreword This report examines the views of a cross section of offenders who were serving sentences of periodic detention in early 2000. It presents views of the criminal justice system from the perspectives of those

8. [2016] NZEnvC 219 Man O'War Farm Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 112 KB]

   ~EFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision made on the papers Decision No. [2016] NZEnvC 2 ~ 4 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). of an appeal under s 156(3) of the LGATPA of Hearing Topics 22 (Natural Hazards and Flooding) and 65 (Definitions) MAN O'WAR FARM LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000261 ) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL...

9. BORA Taxation (Livestock Valuation, Assets Expenditure, and Remedial Matters) Bill [pdf, 278 KB]

   Taxation (Livestock Valuation, Assets Expenditure, and Remedial Matters) Bill 24 August 2012 ATTORNEY-GENERAL Legal Advice Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Taxation (Livestock Valuation, Assets Expenditure, and Remedial Matters) Bill 1. We have considered whether the Taxation (Livestock Valuation, Assets Expenditure, and Remedial Matters) Bill (IRD 16579/2.0) (‘the Bill’) is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘Bill of Right...

10. BORA Defence Amendment Bill [pdf, 232 KB]

    ...implement Government policy as set out in the Defence White Paper 2010. In particular, the Bill strengthens the authority and accountability of the Chief of Defence Force in the role of Chief Executive. It also makes changes in respect of other matters, particularly relating to rank and conditions of service for members of the Armed Forces. 3. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. This advice has been...