Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8027 items matching your search terms

  1. Public perceptions of crime & the criminal justice system survey 2014 results [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    Page 1 Public perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system survey – 2014 results Report prepared for: Ministry of Justice Date: December 2014 Level 1, 6-10 The Strand PO Box 33690 Takapuna, Auckland Ph: 09 919 9200 Level 9, Sybase House, 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington Ph: 04 913 3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Page 2 Page 3 Table of Contents Summary of findin

  2. CO v DSI [2011] NZIACDT 12 (4 April 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...dismissed. It will likely be exceptional when the Tribunal does not consider it is appropriate for its findings of fact, and reasoning to be publicly available. Public access to the reasons why the Tribunal dismisses complaints is as important for open justice as the reasons for upholding complaints. [19] Where a complaint is upheld, parties should expect publication of the decision with identifying information to follow as a matter of routine. In any case, where that is not appropriate,...

  3. CO v IBU [2011] NZIACDT 11 (4 April 2011) [pdf, 70 KB]

    ...dismissed. It will likely be exceptional when the Tribunal does not consider it is appropriate for its findings of fact, and reasoning to be publicly available. Public access to the reasons why the Tribunal dismisses complaints is as important for open justice as the reasons for upholding complaints. [19] Where a complaint is upheld, parties should expect publication of the decision with identifying information to follow as a matter of routine. In any case where that is not appropriate, p...

  4. B Ltd v NK & KX [2025] NZDT 28 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

  5. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 388 KB]

    ...DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 13 May 2025 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 13 December 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 13 December 2024. [1.2] A consent memorandum dated 13 December 2024. [1.3] An agreed summary of facts, a copy...

  6. Waitangi Tribunal bibliography 2021 part 1 [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...grievances. The Tribunal’s membership was increased to seven to cope with a growing workload and from the late 1980s it acquired a dedicated support unit of administrative staff and researchers. This unit was initially provided by the Department of Justice and then, after the department was restructured in 1995, by the Department for Courts. This in turn was merged into the new Ministry of Justice in late 2003. The current Waitangi Tribunal Unit provides a range of registrarial, inquiry...

  7. Jones v Waitemata District Health Board [2014] NZHRRT 52 [pdf, 84 KB]

    ...attachment of a statement of the correction sought but not made. Application of the law to the facts [43] Of all of the information recorded by Ms Nicholson and Mr Rayment, only three short excerpts are challenged by Mr Jones. We have found as a matter of fact that those excerpts accurately record what was said to Ms Nicolson and Mr Rayment by Mr Jones’ daughter and by Mr Jones himself respectively. The notes being accurate we can see no basis whatsoever for holding that the WDHB ou...

  8. [2021] NZEmpC 214 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [pdf, 273 KB]

    ...injunctions can be briefly summarised:5 (a) The Court must consider whether the applicant has established that there is a serious question to be tried. (b) Consideration must be given to the balance of convenience. (c) The overall interests of justice are to be considered as a cross-check, standing back from the detail required by the earlier steps.6 1 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tūhoe Trust [2021] NZERA 388 (Member Robinson). 2 Employment Relations...

  9. [2011] NZEmpC 13 Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v EBIIWU [pdf, 118 KB]

    CARTER HOLT HARVEY LTD v EASTERN BAYS INDEPENDENT INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION NZEmpC AK 21 February 2011 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 13 ARC 95/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Plaintiff AND EASTERN BAYS INDEPENDENT INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION Defendant AND JAMES MOENGAROA, KEVIN OHLSON, DAVID MOKOMOKO, BENJAMIN POMARE AND GLENN TAIT...

  10. [2008] NZEmpC WC 19A/08 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 45 KB]

    ...defendant’s notice of objection to the plaintiff’s notice requiring disclosure should be upheld and the Court of Appeal, by its judgment on 23 June 2006, dismissed the plaintiff’s application for leave. On this basis it was submitted the matters were res judicata and the pursuit of the relief sought under paragraph 1(b) of the statement of claim was an attempt to re- litigate matters already decided and therefore an abuse of process. [14] As to paragraph 1(a) of t...