Search Results

1. BN & IN v X Ltd [2021] NZDT 1616 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

2. IQ v UF [2023] NZDT 1 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

3. O Homes Ltd v BL & SL [2023] NZDT 523 (12 October 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

4. WH v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 542 (16 October 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. L Ltd v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 603 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...purchases of gib board off [Online auction CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 website]. These were to be provided by 14 July 2023. No further information was provided. Therefore, I have closed the hearing, and this decision will resolve the matter Issues 7. The issues I need to resolve are: a. What is the contractual arrangement between the parties relating to markups on materials? b. What is a reasonable amount due on the invoices? c. Can T Ltd’s costs be awarded?...

6. BU & DQ v NN [2023] NZDT 281 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...as a result. That is not a breach of the contract, and is actually an appropriate step. I am unable to see any other breaches by the Applicants. 10. I find that NN has breached the contract, and BU and DQ have not. 11. On a technical legal matter, NN has attempted to end the contract by saying she did not wish to complete it. In law, under the terms of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, this is a repudiation and not a cancellation; and the Applicants had the choice of cancell...

7. BN & UG v EI [2023] NZDT 234 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

8. LE v BI [2024] NZDT 31 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

9. JL v P Ltd & SX [2024] NZDT 685 (27 August 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. QC v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 782 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...