Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 1 Hill v Workforce Development Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...of issues that are not straightforward. Such costs may be rendered unnecessary depending on the outcome of the appeal process. [8] On balance I consider that a stay of the applications for costs and for joinder is in the overall interests of justice. While Mr O’Sullivan, on Mrs Hill’s behalf, proposes that a stay could be subject to conditions as to security over Mrs Hill’s property, I do not consider this to be a desirable, or necessary, course. Nor do I understand WDL...

2. BORA Ngati Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...with law, for judicial review of that determination." 5. Section 27(2) applies to a determination by a Tribunal or public authority that is adjudicative in nature.[1] A negotiated settlement between two parties is not an adjudication of the matters in dispute. Nor can it be said the Crown is a tribunal or public authority. 6. Clause 15 precludes judicial review of any previous determination of rights and interests, such as the Waitangi Tribunal’s preliminary report on the Taranaki...

3. BORA Ngāti Haua Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...transfers to Ngāti Hauā of various items of cultural redress, and the provision of financial and commercial redress. With respect to cultural redress, the Bill provides claimants with various associated rights in respect of culturally significant matters, including participation in governance, resource management and related decision-making. Privative Clause 3. Clause 15 provides the settlement of the historical claims is final and excludes the jurisdiction of the courts, the Waitan...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 27 Barbara Buckett & Assoc t/a Buckett Law v Farani [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...I am satisfied (by a narrow margin) that, while unfortunate, the delay does not of itself warrant the exercise of my discretion against granting the application for substituted service. [6] I am satisfied that it is in the broader interests of justice that the application be granted and the following orders are made: (a) The Registrar is to allocate a half day fixture for the hearing of the challenge. (b) The plaintiff will, as soon as reasonably practicable, cause publication...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 56 Boyd v Blanchard [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...novelty and/or importance of the question involved; whether the successful party will be injured or prejudiced by a stay; the balance of convenience; and the public interest in the proceedings. The overarching consideration is the interests of justice.3 [3] The application in this case is primarily focussed on the claimed financial circumstances of the defendant. Mr Boyd expresses concern that, if he is required to pay the awards made against him, the impact on his business will...

6. Deputy IGIS position description [docx, 68 KB]

   ...intelligence and security agency has for ensuring the compliance of their operational activities with their respective laws. With the Prime Minister’s concurrence, the IGIS may also report at any time – generally as with the annual report or on particular matters – to the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. Appointed by: The Governor-General on the recommendation of the House of Representatives. (This recommendation is made following consultation with the Intelligence a...

7. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 495 KB]

   ...parties resolved all 1 This decision is to be cited as Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 1. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 1 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 30 October 2024. [1.2] A consent memorandum dated 30 October 2024. [1.3] An agreed summary of facts, a copy o...

8. Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) 2017 NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...proceedings in the Family Court. In those proceedings Mr De Polo sought a Protection Order against his former de facto partner, Mrs K Apostolakis, the plaintiff in the present proceedings. Ms Rennie was also acting for Mr De Polo in relationship property matters arising out of his relationship with Mrs Apostolakis. According to the statement of claim, Mr De Polo passed away on 13 July 2015. [2] In these proceedings under Part 2 of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) Mrs Apostolakis alle...

9. BORA Family Courts Matters Bill [pdf, 281 KB]

   Family Courts Matters Bill 4 December 2006 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: Family Courts Matters Bill Our Ref: ATT395/23 1. We have considered the Family Courts Matters Bill (PCO 6771/4) and have concluded that it is not inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA). We understand that the Bill is to be considered by the Cabinet Legislation Committee at its meeting on 14 December 2006. Overview of Bil...

10. Director of Proceedings v Taranaki District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 613 KB]

    ...is satisfied that it is desirable to do so. [7] To determine this, the Tribunal must consider whether there is material before the Tribunal to show specific adverse consequences sufficient to justify an exception to the fundamental rule of open justice. The Tribunal must also consider whether an order is reasonably necessary to secure the “proper administration of justice” in proceedings before it and does no more than is necessary to achieve that (see Waxman v Pal (Application f...