Search Results

1. When someone dies suddenly guide [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...deaths occurring in similar circumstances. Coroners have made recommendations to change road layouts, install barriers at train level- crossings, inform organisational policy, help improve workplace safety, and in relation to a wide range of other matters to reduce preventable deaths and make Aotearoa a safer place for everyone. A coroner doesn’t seek to blame or punish people. They don’t make decisions about civil or criminal liability. Do all deaths in Aotearoa New Zealand...

2. MOJ0047 When somebody dies suddenly guide [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...deaths occurring in similar circumstances. Coroners have made recommendations to change road layouts, install barriers at train level- crossings, inform organisational policy, help improve workplace safety, and in relation to a wide range of other matters to reduce preventable deaths and make Aotearoa a safer place for everyone. A coroner doesn’t seek to blame or punish people. They don’t make decisions about civil or criminal liability. Do all deaths in Aotearoa New Zealand...

3. MOJ0047_NOV22_FINAL_WEB.pdf [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...deaths occurring in similar circumstances. Coroners have made recommendations to change road layouts, install barriers at train level- crossings, inform organisational policy, help improve workplace safety, and in relation to a wide range of other matters to reduce preventable deaths and make Aotearoa a safer place for everyone. A coroner doesn’t seek to blame or punish people. They don’t make decisions about civil or criminal liability. Do all deaths in Aotearoa New Zealand...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 114 Maharaj v Recon Professional Services Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

   ASHISH MAHARAJ v RECON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 114 [3 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 114 WRC 7/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ASHISH MAHARAJ Plaintiff AND RECON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18, 19, 20 June 2014 (heard at Wellington) Appearances: G Bennett, advo...

5. BORA Meat Board Restructuring Bill [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omis...

6. WQ Ltd v ND Ltd [2020] NZDT 1323 (10 November 2020) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

7. CJ v HQ Ltd [2020] NZDT 1367 (16 June 2020) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...accept that the delay in returning the set has led to understandable suspicion about CJ’s intentions. However, those suspicions do not amount to evidence upon which I can base findings. It is clear that an error was made at the point of sale about a matter of importance to the contract. The cookware set was not sent until three weeks after purchase. Upon receipt of this, CJ had grounds to believe the dispute was resolved, and it took another 6 weeks to realise this was not the case....

8. HJ Ltd v OI [2023] NZDT 140 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

9. ND v EN [2022] NZDT 263 (13 December 2022) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

10. UW v GC Ltd [2024] NZDT 245 (17 March 2024) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...41. The $4,590.00 loss claimed has not been substantiated. 42. Accordingly, this part of the claim has not been proven and no damages are awarded. Is UW entitled to compensation for stress and emotional harm? 43. UW’s handling of this matter was a significant contributor in the significant stress levels of all parties involved. 44. UW’s repeated threats of legal action and prolonged engagement with GC Ltd’s lawyer has cost GC Ltd significant time and legal fees. The d...