Search Results

1. SG & LN v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 715 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

2. EN v KH [2022] NZDT 182 (23 September 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

3. X Ltd v EK [2024] NZDT 784 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

4. HT v IF Ltd [2024] NZDT 333 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. Wai 3300, 6.2.018 Wānanga ā-rohe background paper [pdf, 598 KB]

   ...the Kotahitanga movement, and organisations such as the Iwi Chairs Forum, the New Zealand Māori Council and the Māori Women’s Welfare League. Tikanga In Lex Aotearoa: An Heroic Attempt to Map the Māori Dimension in Modern New Zealand Law, Justice Tā Joe Williams explains that tikanga denotes law, and that it was a ‘system by which correctness, rightness or justice is maintained’.15 This system also includes ‘customs or behaviours that might not be called law but rather cu...

6. BT v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 417 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

7. FC v QK [2024] NZDT 415 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...another ventilation kit with a heat transfer upgrade at a cost of $3,891.91. FC advised QK all the equipment he had installed was packed in a box, except for the vents which remained in the celling. 11. FC and QK did not reach a resolution of the matter, and on 15 February 2024, FC lodged a claim in the Tribunal seeking $2,600 from QK. The amount sought included $174.80 for [Electrical Company]’s visit in June 2022 to inspect the system for fault. Issues 12. The issues for th...

8. Dickinson v Southon - Section 4A Block IV Tokaanu Township [2023] Chief Judge's MB 499 (2023 CJ 499) [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20100006117 AP-20230000026797 CJ 2010/13 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Section 4A Block IV Tokaanu Township I WAENGA I A Between KAHI DICKINSON and JULIANA MIRIAMA SMALLMAN Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And JAMES NGAKURU ASHER SOUTHON, JANE TEAOWHAITINI KATHLEEN PATTERSON,...

9. BORA Court Matters Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   4091807_FINAL WORD VERSION BORA ADVICE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL - COURTS MATTERS BILL.DOCX 21 June 2017 Attorney General Courts Matters Bill (PCO 20266/5.0) – consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/220 1. We have examined the Courts Matters Bill for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (“Bill of Rights Act”). We have concluded that whilst the Bill raises some issues under the Bill of Rights Act, it is not inconsi...

10. Directory of Official Information 2019 S-U [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...see any material held by the NZSIS, including sensitive operational information, and has a right of access to NZSIS staff, premises and records in order to fulfil these oversight and review functions. The Inspector-General conducts inquiries into matters, including individual complaints, report findings and recommendations to the Minister. Those reports, excluding matters of security concern, may be found in the Reports section of the Inspector-General's website (www.igis.govt.nz)....