Search Results

1. Nelson Standards Committee v Smith [2018] NZLCDT 34 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...Applicant No Appearance by or for the Respondent 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL [1] The three charges brought against Mr Smith were heard by way of formal proof, because the practitioner had elected to take no steps in this matter. The charges are correctly summarised in the submissions of counsel for the Standards Committee as follows: “(a) That, in breaching High Court orders and directions, Mr Smith committed a disciplinary offence that constituted unsa...

2. [2022] NZACC 158 – Sua v ACC (16 August 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ACR 125/21 IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 158 ACR 125/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN FITI SU’A Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 29 July 2022 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: S Macann on behalf of the appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and...

3. Patena v Cook - Paora Poha Ti Raha Trust (2023) 468 Aotea MB 265 (468 AOT 265) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...combination of resolutions of the issues of law and fact on which the substantive applications could succeed.2 [11] I must then consider all relevant factors and decide where the balance of convenience lies. Overall, I must consider the overall justice of the case, in light of the kaupapa and principles of the Act.3 Kōrerorero Discussion [12] There are two jurisdictional issues to address. The first is whether the injunction application can proceed because the applicant h...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 164 Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...that the usual requirements for notice and a hearing could result in greater environmental damage. The issue is whether such risk outweighs the general desirability of adherence to the usual procedure of the Court and the principles of natural justice, including in particular hearing both sides to a case before making an order affecting the rights and interests of a party. In terms of s 320(3) I am obliged to consider what the effect of not making the order would be on the envir...

5. Ratima v Smith - Te Haroto 2B2B (2024) 113 Tākitimu MB 287 (113 TKT 287) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District AP-20230000021624 A20150002509 WĀHANGA Under Section 237, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Haroto 2B2B I WAENGA I A Between HENARE RĀTIMA Te kaitono Applicant ME And IVY KAHUKIWA SMITH Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 1 March 2017, 58 Tākitimu MB 97-106 3...

6. Forms & fees

   ...Form 24 Filing fee $285 Scheduling fee $399 Hearing fee per half day $399 following the first half day  Section 274, Resource Management Act 1991 Notice of person's wish to be party to proceedings Form 33 Filing fee $114 Exceptions: Joining a matter under 87G, 149T, 198E and 198K RMA    Section 278(3)(b) Application for production of documents Notice of Motion (General)Form 36 Filing fee $228  No scheduling fee Hearing fee per half day $399 following the second d...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court

7. [2023] NZEmpC 69 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...hand. Various factors will be taken into account, mainly to prevent duplicate proceedings being conducted in different courts.11 [15] The principal consideration for deciding whether there should be a stay of proceedings is the interests of justice in the particular case.12 The application for a stay is unsuccessful [16] The situation is then that there are no relevant proceedings in the Court of Appeal or elsewhere. Further, even the foreshadowed application for judicial revie...

8. M D Cottle Family Trust & Anor v CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...appeal to us against it by a written notice setting out the information which the appellant wishes us to consider. We must deal with the appeal by way of rehearing. [9] In dealing with a substantive appeal, we should confine our findings to such matters as can fairly be said to be within the scope of the original complaint to the Authority; but that should be considered in light of the consumer protection purpose of the Act and take into account that most complainants are lay consumers...

9. Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 16 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...the employee contribution, to write a report and recommendation to the Corporation; the Corporation then had to make a decision on the application under s 102(10), with a right of appeal to the Authority. [43] I am satisfied that the interests of justice are best served in this case by the Authority following the recommended remedy in Lukes, and referring the matter back to the Corporation under 109(8), subject to directions that will result in the same outcome as should have been achie...

10. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 903 KB]

    ...Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:o...