Search Results

1. Singh v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 27 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...the absence of a specific claim for compensation, no order will be made. Publication [23] The Tribunal will routinely publish the name of an Adviser and the reasons for its decision where a complaint is upheld. That is a usual incident of open justice, and this decision will be published in the normal way. Order [24] The Adviser is censured. [25] The Adviser is ordered to pay a penalty of $2,500. [26] The Adviser is ordered to refund fees amounting to $1,420. [27] There has be...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 77 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...unresolved issue of costs associated with the judgment on the preliminary issue. [6] As to the second proceeding, Dr Sawyer was unsuccessful in her application for an extension of time so that, apart from dealing with costs, there are no outstanding matters. The third proceeding is Dr Sawyer’s challenge to the penalty and it is yet to be set down for a hearing. [7] An application for recusal has to be considered in light of the Supreme Court decision in Saxmere Company Ltd v Wo...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 72 Thebe v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand (Interlocutory judgment of Judge Beck, 8 April 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...THINZIYELO THEBE v HEALTH NEW ZEALAND – TE WHATU ORA [2025] NZEmpC 72 [8 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 72 EMPC 319/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of execution BETWEEN THINZIYELO THEBE Plaintiff AND HEALTH NEW ZEALAND – TE WHATU...

4. [2007] NZEmpC WC 18A/07 Service and Food Workers Union v Auckland DHB & 15 Ors [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...cancelled each other out in any event. [9] Cost neutrality has long been a feature of true test cases in this Court. We think this is a case in which that principle should be followed. For all these reasons we consider that the interests of justice require us to refuse Spotless’s application for costs and we do so. All parties will meet their own costs without contributions from others. GL Colgan Chief Judge for the full Court Judgment signed at 10.30 am...

5. Affiliated Business Consultants Ltd v CAC20005/CAC304 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 107 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 76 READT 098/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN AFFILIATED BUSINESS CONSULTANTS LTD Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC20005 & 304) First respondent AND MARTIN AND LISA DAVENPORT Second respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Ms N Dangen - Member HEA...

6. 30 September Legal Aid News 2015 [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...seeking confirmation of availability for rotational assignments with a same day appearance. Grant officers will still however attempt to contact you by phone call in the first instance. We are aware that since a change was made in the Ministry of Justice’s phone system at the end of last year, the usual caller identification service is no longer available. We are working to change this but in the meantime text messaging will be of particular benefit to you when we attempt to make cont...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 17 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...delay, the length of the delay, any prejudice, and the potential impact on rights and liabilities.3 Ultimately an application such as the one currently before the Court must be assessed, and determined, having regard to the overall interests of justice.4 [5] Mr Clarke, who is representing the plaintiff, has confirmed that he was unaware of the requirement to file a reply within 10 working days and that he is a recently retired lay advocate. He submits that it would be unfair to ef...

8. Form-2-2nd-appeal-conviction-or-sentence-application-for-leave.doc [doc, 40 KB]

   ...………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6. (a) The court may grant leave only if satisfied that the appeal involves a matter of general or public importance or that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred, or may occur unless the appeal is heard. Why should the court give you leave to appeal? ………………………�...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 068 Environmental Defence Society Inc v Minister for Environment [pdf, 183 KB]

   EDS v MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND MINISTER OF FORESTRY – STAY IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 68 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an application for declarations under s311 of the Act BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2023-CHC-002) Applicant AND MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND MINISTER OF FORESTRY Respondents Court: Environment Judge P A...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 220 Napier City Council v McMillan [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...the effect of not making the order would be on the environment; whether the applicant has given an appropriate undertaking as to damages; whether I should hear from the applicant or any person against whom the orders are sought; and such other matters as I think fit. 4 Affidavit of Mark Douglas Huntley, dated 17 December 2020. 8 Grounds for making an interim order ex parte (22] Under s 320(2) of the RMA, an application for an interim enforcement order may be made without notic...