Search Results

1. LCDT-form-I-appln-revoc-ord-term-prohibit-employmt-form-July-25 [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...Tribunal, is supported by an affidavit made by me deponent name and which I attach to this application. (In your affidavit, please specify the grounds on which the order for revocation is sought, the particulars of these grounds and also include all matters that may satisfy the Tribunal that you are a fit and proper person to be employed by a practitioner pursuant to section 247(3) of the Act.) The application is made in reliance on: Section 248(1) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Ac...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 95 Kingipotiki v Taplin [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...citing Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1981] 1 All ER 213 (EWCA). (c) Is there a real risk the property will be moved out of the jurisdiction or dissipate? (d) Do the balance of convenience and interests of justice require the order to be granted? [14] Once made a freezing order restrains a party to whom it applies from removing assets located in or outside New Zealand, or disposing of, dealing with or diminishing the value of those assets....

3. RC v LUD Group Ltd [2021] NZDT 1380 (20 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

4. TQ v ON [2022] NZDT 242 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

5. NG & OG v JS [2024] NZDT 33 (18 January 2024) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

6. CS & KS v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 605 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised...

7. DS v SI [2024] NZDT 729 (23 September 2024) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

8. XG v B Ltd & EH [2024] NZDT 733 (21 September 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. MH & YH as Trustees of MH Family Trust v W Ltd & OK [2024] NZDT 509 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

10. Form-1-Residence-Appeal.pdf [pdf, 333 KB]

    ...RESIDENCE APPEAL – 3/03/2025 Page 5 of 6 Step 7. Consent to release of information This authorisation MUST be signed by every person included in the appeal aged 17 years or older. 1. I authorise the Tribunal to seek information from the Ministry of Justice and/or the New Zealand Police about my criminal record and/or any complaints, charges or investigations. I authorise the Ministry of Justice, the New Zealand Police, the Department of Corrections and the New Zealand Parole Board to...