8020 items matching your search terms
148 Taitokerau MB 237 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20150001626 UNDER Sections 19 and 319, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horahora 1A1, Horahora 1A3B and Horahora 1A4C BETWEEN TAHAU MAHANGA Applicant AND VIOLET SADE Respondent Hearing: On the papers (Heard at Chambers, Whangarei) Judgment: 26 April 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG
...the nature of suppression orders. [14] We also take account of the fact that this is a practitioner with a long professional history (30 years) during which she has undertaken much pro-bono and low-cost work in an effort to provide access to justice to many clients. Principles of penalty relevant in this matter [15] Mr Collins, in his submissions, directed us to the importance of general and specific deterrence in this matter. He submitted that a censure and $3,000 fine needed...
MELVILLE V AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD AK 8 July 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 87 ARC 18/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LYNETTE MELVILLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD Defendant Hearing: 17 June 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Greg Lloyd, counsel for the plaintiff Tim Cleary, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 July 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S T...
2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 652 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180005233 Appeal 2018/10 UNDER Section 79, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block BETWEEN VIVIENNE THERESSE TAUEKI Appellant AND HOROWHENUA 11 (LAKE) MĀORI RESERVATION TRUST First Respondent AND MANAWATU-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL TRADING AS HORIZONS Second Respondent Hearing:...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 32 READT 001/2021 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 1907 AGAINST MARY TAPU Defendant Hearing 31 May – 1 June 2021, at Hamilton Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr N O’Connor, Member Ms F Mathieson, Member Appearances: Mr S Waalkens and Ms E...
...and there is good reason to read ss 231 and 351, which apply to the particular situation of a general review, in a manner consistent with those powers. [31] The following analysis of the relationship between ss 231 and 351 from the decision of Justice McGechan in the High Court is also pertinent. Justice McGechan held: 14 The most significant point is that s 231, the counterpart of s 351, is complemented in respect of trusts constituted under Part XIII by the express powers in ss 239 a...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2017] NZIACDT 9 Reference No: IACDT 013/16 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar Between Kevin Almero Complainant AND Herminigilda (Loreen) Carlos Advisers DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms T Thompson, law...
...Protection Tribunal. It is the first to cover 12 months, from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. The Immigration Act 2009 imposes no reporting requirements on the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. Nevertheless, on 19 April 2011, the then Minister of Justice accepted the Chair’s offer to provide him, the Minister for Courts, and the Minister of Immigration with an annual report on the Tribunal’s activities. The Immigration and Protection Tribunal is established under sectio...
...New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay [2013] NZCA 582 (footnotes omitted). [35] Mr Upton also referred to what is occasionally described as an intermediate position to effect a balance between the interests of the parties in the interests of justice. In Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd the High Court held: 15 In applications of this kind it is necessary carefully to weigh all of the factors in the balance between the right of a successful liti...
...Reduction of the scope of COVID-19 orders 11. The Bill removes the ability for the Director-General of Health and the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety to make COVID-19 orders (see clauses 7 and 9). 12. It also reduces the scope of matters for which the Minister for COVID-19 Response can make COVID-19 orders to include: a. self-isolation (for COVID-19 cases, household contacts, close contacts), and mask wearing requirements in the community. b. requiring travellers to...