Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

5456 items matching your search terms

  1. Te Amo v Nicholas - Te Whaiti Nui A Toi Block (2020) 233 Waiariki MB 92 (233 WAR 93) [pdf, 387 KB]

    ...owners of the building. [35] Although common law provides that the owners of the land own any fixtures, s 18(l)(a) enables the Court to recognise that one or more of the owners may separately own a particular improvement. In determining these matters the Court has equitable jurisdiction and may recognise constructive trusts. [36] The Māori Appellate Court has expressed differing views as to the effect of a s 18(1)(a) order, in particular whether, on making the order, a house remai...

  2. LCRO 20/2017 AP v RE (20 December 2018) [pdf, 243 KB]

    ...complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) about Mr W’s fees. [12] Mr RE filed memoranda in the High Court in relation to the notices of claim and related child support issues. These memoranda addressed matters that had been raised by Ms Z through her lawyer. [13] In October 2015, Mr AP and Ms Z settled all issues between them. 3 [14] In July 2016 Mr RE filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal to recover his unpaid fees. Mr AP filed a...

  3. Te Korowai Tiaki o Te Hauauru Incorporated v Te Rūnanga o Ngati Tama Trust - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Tama Trust (2020) 425 Aotea MB 203 (425 AOT 203) [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...established by declaration of trust dated 20 January 2003 (“the trust deed”).1 It is a post-settlement governance entity.2 Because it is a trust constituted in respect of any general land owned by Māori, this Court has jurisdiction over it.3 [2] Matters concerning the Rūnanga were first heard by this Court on 18 October 2019. At that stage, a number of issues were raised concerning the Rūnanga’s affairs. Primary among them was a proposal for the Rūnanga to enter into an...

  4. [2021] NZREADT 28 - New Zealand LJ International Limited & Zeng (15 June 2021) [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...He did not offer any explanation for having failed to file a response to the charges or having failed to advise that he would participate in the hearing. He remained at the hearing and made submissions. Facts [9] The charges focus on two matters: [a] the Agency’s failure to provide trust account audit reports in accordance with the Real Estate Agents (Audit) Regulations 2009) (“the audit regulations”) for the financial year ending 31 March 2016 and for the period fro...

  5. Patel v Dean [2020] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...[12] On 29 March 2018 Mr Dean replied to Mr Patel’s information privacy request made on 8 February 2018. He advised Mr Patel he would charge him $19,175.47 for the release of his file. Mr Dean stated this was calculated using the Ministry of Justice charging 3 guidelines, based on an estimate of the number of pages in the file. Mr Patel did not consider this charge was reasonable and did not pay it. [13] On 14 May 2018 Mr Patel’s application to set aside the judgment de...

  6. COVID-19 (Vaccinations) Legislation Bill [pdf, 247 KB]

    ...who are authorised persons.9 The Minister may also make orders to require affected workers for specified work to undergo medical examination, and/or impose certain other duties or requirements. Under s 11AA the Minister must be satisfied of certain matters before making an order, including that the order does not limit or is a justified limit on the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. 16. Clause 13 of the Bill introduces new s 33AA, which sets out the power to make...

  7. LCRO 28/2017 HK v TX (31 May 2019) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...decision, the Committee concluded that: (a) there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaints; (b) inquiry into the complaints was unlikely to result in any adverse disciplinary findings against Mr TX; (c) the underlying subject matter of the complaints had been before the Courts; and (d) issues raised by the complaints could appropriately be addressed through the appeal process. Application for review [19] Ms HK filed an application for review on 22 January 2016....

  8. [2020] NZREADT 12 - Feschiev (4 May 2020) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...one point, the vendors told her that they were then residing in Australia and that the report from the laboratory was stored in an attic of a property there. They also said that they would not have access to it until they went back to Australia. Matters were left on the basis that once the vendors returned to Australia, they would locate the report and send it to Ms Cruickshank. [9] In fact, a copy of the report was eventually provided and it did contain a statement excluding the...

  9. [2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...that he had done so because the information belonged to other organisations which were involved in the shared services project and deletion was necessary to protect their interests. [3] The parties attended mediation in an effort to resolve matters and settlement was reached. One of the terms of settlement 1 was that the plaintiff’s employment would come to an end on an agreed basis, namely by reason of redundancy. The agreement was signed off by a mediator pursuant to s 149...

  10. Davies v Trustees of Te Tii Waitangi B3 Ahu Whenua Trust - Te Tii Waitangi B3 Trust [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 611 (2015 APPEAL 611) [pdf, 397 KB]

    2015 Māori Appellate Court 611 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A200140012970 APPEAL 2015/3 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 31 October 2014 at 90 Taitokerau MB 67-106 in respect of Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust and Lot 16 Deposited Plan 61631 and Lot 18 Deposited Plan 61631 BETWEEN MEREAWAROA DAVIES AND RICHARD BOYD TAKIMOANA