8020 items matching your search terms
SUPERCITY TOWING LIMITED v SAKALIA HUCH [2023] NZEmpC 125 [11 August 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 125 EMPC 100/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN SUPERCITY TOWING LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAKALIA HUCH Defendant...
...In his response, Mr HM says he had not previously acted for Dr OR, and the trust. He says there is “a severe shortage of civil legal aid lawyers”, and if he could not 6 act for Ms T it was “likely” she “would not receive access to justice”.8 [30] In his submission it was “not illegal to request information”, but regardless, the information he received from Ms KD “was kept confidential” to Ms T, and “not shared” with other lawyers except for the draft state...
...have a bearing on costs. But it does not have a bearing on the substance.” [15] In Garlick v REAA [2014] NZREADT 40, we recently held: “[50] The Tribunal treats appeals as hearing de novo … [51] However, it would be a breach of natural justice for the respondent to have to deal with completely new matters not raised in the complaint. However issues can and do become refined or more or less important during the appeal process. In this case the issues which are dealt with in th...
BARBARA MCCONNELL v BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MT ROSKILL GRAMMAR SCHOOL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 150 [9 August 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 150 ARC 34/13 IN THE MATTER OF challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BARBARA MCCONNELL Plaintiff AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MT ROSKILL GRAMMAR SCHOOL Defendant Hearing: 17 June 2013 and by submissions filed by the defen...
Evaluation of the Court-Referred Restorative Justice Pilot: Technical Report Prepared by the Crime and Justice Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington with Sue Triggs for the Ministry of Justice May 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the former Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the a
EDEN V RUTHERFORD & BOND TOYOTA LTD WN 21 April 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 43 WRC 40/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRIAN EDEN Plaintiff AND RUTHERFORD & BOND TOYOTA LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 13 and 29 March and 7 April 2010 Judgment: 21 April 2010 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This judgment dea...
...application was declined, and the reasons for that decision. [4] The only outstanding matter that remained was to consider what orders would be appropriate in this case. Mr XX forwarded submission on the practitioner’s behalf in relation to these matters. [5] By s 211(1)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (the Act) I am able to make any orders that could have been made by a Standards Committee. The range of orders that may be made are set out in section 156(1) of the A...
DOLLAR KING LIMITED v HYOWON JUN [2020] NZEmpC 91 [29 June 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 91 EMPC 10/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DOLLAR KING LIMITED Plaintiff AND HYOWON JUN Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J Lapthorne and M Hutcheson, coun...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 30 LCDT 009/16 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN HAWKE’S BAY LAWYERS STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND MR E Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms C Rowe Ms S Sage Mr W Smith Mr I Williams DATE OF HEARING 30 & 31 August 2016 HELD AT Hastings District Court DATE OF DECISION 3 Octob...
...cancellation was not available. The Tribunal ordered Mr Wright to pay compensation to landlords and the Agency, in respect of payments of bond money and rent misappropriated by him (“the compensation orders”).3 [2] This decision addresses two matters: [a] The Real Estate Authority’s request for variation of the compensation orders; and [b] The Committee’s application for an order that Mr Wright pay costs to the Committee. The compensation orders [3] The Tribunal d...