Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8016 items matching your search terms

  1. [2017] NZEnvC 125 Auckland Council v Mao Lau Jesus 2016 Co Ltd & Cao Cindy Property Management Ltd [pdf, 181 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT UNDER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND AND AND AND Decision No. [2017J NZEnvC I;;J, 5 the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for substituted service under s 352 of the Act AUCKLAND COUNCIL Applicant (ENV-2017 -AKL-000117) LlANSEN MAO First Respondent EE KUOH LAU (AUGUSTINE LAU) Second Respondent JESUS (2016) COMPANY LTD Third Respondent XINWEN CAO (CINDY CAO) Fourth Respondent CINDY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD Fi...

  2. LCRO Application for review [pdf, 983 KB]

    ...you need further assistance, then please contact the Tribunal on: Ph: 0800 367 6838 Email: LCRO@justice.govt.nz Application fees are non-refundable. Important information You cannot lodge an application for a review of a decision unless the matter has been considered by a Standards Committee, and an order, decision, determination or direction has been made. You have 30 working days from the date of the Standards Committee decision to file your application and payment with th...

  3. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 3760 [2013] NZCOP 14 [pdf, 136 KB]

    ...Tribunal that, in relation to the relevant infringement or notice, the particular presumption or presumptions are correct.” [9] These presumptions provide the principal basis on which the Tribunal is to determine that it is “satisfied” of the matters to which s 122O(1) refers. [10] In the enforcement notice, the following appears under the heading “Detail of alleged infringement that triggered this notice”: “IP Address: 125.239.64.40 Date and time of alleged infring...

  4. [2020] NZEnvC 020 Whangarei District Council v Sustainable Solvents Group Limited [pdf, 730 KB]

    ...would be on the environment; and (b) whether the applicant has given an appropriate undertaking as to damages; and (c) whether the Judge should hear the applicant or any person against whom the interim order is sought; and (d) such other matters as the Judge thinks fit. The Judge shall direct the applicant or another person to serve a copy of the interim enforcement order on the person against whom the order is made; and the order shall take effect from when it is served or su...

  5. [2024] NZEmpC 171 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory (No 3) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...On 29 July 2024, the Foundation filed a memorandum of counsel in which it seeks that the Court appoint a pūkenga or an expert; it also seeks leave to present its submissions at the hearing of the proceeding via audio-visual link. Both of these matters are being treated as formal applications in this judgment. Application to appoint a pūkenga [3] The Foundation’s application seeks that the Court exercise its power to appoint a pūkenga or an expert to explain the tikanga Māori...

  6. [2024] NZEnvC 285 Valentine v Auckland Council [pdf, 232 KB]

    Valentine v Auckland Council & Metlifecare Retirement Villages Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 285 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN SUSAN WYNNE VALENTINE (ENV-2024-AKL-000016) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND METLIFECARE RETIREMENT VILLAGES LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey sitting alone un...

  7. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 12th-14th reports (continued) [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...Related Intolerance, New Zealand had reaffirmed its commitment to tolerance, respect for diversity and reparation for past errors. In that spirit, the Crown had offered its apologies to a number of communities that had, at various times, suffered injustice at the hands of the New Zealand Government. 9. Recalling that Tokelau was New Zealand’s last remaining non-self-governing territory, he said that the report on Tokelau was annexed to New Zealand’s report. Racial discrimination wa...

  8. Rafiq v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...proceedings [3] By Minute dated 23 December 2011 the Chairperson consolidated these three proceedings under Regulation 16(1) of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002: [3] The statement of reply filed by the Chief Executive in these three matters at para [4] also points out that the statement of claim in HRRT 037/2011 is bereft of particulars and it is possible that the claims in 037/2011 and 039/2011 relate to the same matters. [4] If the Chief Executive is embarrassed in...

  9. LCRO 78/2020 NS v GL (29 June 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...consistent with the terms of the retainer and the duty to take reasonable care. Disclosure and communication of information to clients 7 A lawyer must promptly disclose to a client all information that the lawyer has or acquires that is relevant to the matter in respect of which the lawyer is engaged by the client. [20] The Committee said:14 The Standards Committee wished to emphasise, however, that the simple fact that Mr NS did not receive the outcome he was hoping for, and now w...

  10. CEIT Practice Notes 2022 [pdf, 460 KB]

    ...and land arising from the Canterbury earthquakes that occurred in 2010 and 2011.2 The Tribunal’s processes are:3 • inquisitorial, enabling it to investigate the claim in a nonconfrontational way; and • subject to the principles of natural justice to ensure that its processes are fair and transparent. From the outset, the parties will be encouraged to work together on matters that are agreed.4 The Tribunal is governed by the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (th...