Martin v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) [2018] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 205 KB]
...Mr Mulligan raised issues. [36] Accordingly, she submitted, the Committee was correct to find that in this case, Mr Martin’s supervision of Mr Mulligan was insufficient to meet the requirements of s 50 of the Act. Discussion Preliminary matters [37] We note, first, that in his oral submissions, Mr Child referred to information given to him by Mr Martin, shortly before the appeal hearing, as to his involvement in the transaction. This was information that Mr Martin could (an...