[2014] NZEmpC 78 Workforce Development Ltd v Hill [pdf, 76 KB]
...both unjustifiably dismissed and subjected to unjustifiable disadvantage in the Authority. He submits that while the Authority concluded that the defendant had been unjustifiably dismissed, and made no findings in relation to disadvantage, all matters are globally before the Court on a de novo challenge. [8] The submissions advanced on behalf of the defendant reflect a misunderstanding. A de novo challenge does not provide the blank canvas that is contended for. If the defend...