Search Results

1. Webster - Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) (2012) 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (42 WMN 83) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (42 WMN 83) A20120004724 UNDER Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 AND UNDER Section 338, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) BETWEEN DIANA CHRISTINE WEBSTER Applicant Judgment: 28 June 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY Cop...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 91 Johnstone v Kinetic Employment Ltd [pdf, 253 KB]

   BRIDGETTE JOHNSTONE v KINETIC EMPLOYMENT LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 91 [2 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 91 EMPC 210/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRIDGETTE JOHNSTONE Plaintiff AND KINETIC EMPLOYMENT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 21 May 2019 (Heard at Auckland)...

3. LB & QB v REAA & LI [2011] NZREADT 39 [pdf, 106 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZREADT 39 READT 013/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LB AND QB Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10058) First respondent AND LI Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Mr G Denley - Member HEARD at AUCKLAND on 24 November 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 7...

4. Wilson and Anor v CAC20008 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...Application for Recall rather than an appeal. 5 [12] He also invited us to deal with this application on the papers and to decline it. Relevant Law [13] The legal position in respect of recall is conveniently set out in the judgment of Justice Goddard in Svitzer Salvage BV v Z Energy Limited & Anor [2013] NZHC 3541. [14] As Mr McDonald puts it, paragraphs [16] and [17] of the judgment neatly set out the position as follows: “[16] Against that context, I refer to th...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 169 Goulden v Capital and Coast District Health Board [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...that a genuine issue has arisen as to the correct means by which time should be calculated. There is no evidence of any prejudice to the plaintiff, who consents to any necessary extension of time. I am satisfied that it is in the interests of justice for the Court to act on its own motion and to grant leave for the statement of defence to be filed and served out of time. The formal order of 7 An example of this principle is contain...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 177 SAI Systems Ltd v Bird [pdf, 81 KB]

   SAI SYSTEMS LIMITED v GRAEME BIRD NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 177 [22 September 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 177 WRC 12/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SAI SYSTEMS LIMITED Plaintiff AND GRAEME BIRD Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by submissions dated 30 June, 28 July, 5, 8 and 12 August and 9 September 2014) Counsel:...

7. Auckland Standards Committee v Khan [2014] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 149 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 15 LCDT 031/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 5 Applicant AND MOHAMMED KHAN Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Mr W Smith Ms S Sage Mr M Gough HEARING at Auckland Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre DATE OF HEARING 18 March 2014 A...

8. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Bean [2016] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...process is considered to enhance public confidence in the profession and to protect members of the public. It has been said: decision “… the Act itself is designed to promote public confidence in lawyers by an open approach to disciplinary matters”. “The public interest in being aware of the proceedings in which a practitioner has been found guilty of misconduct and is suspended, and knowing that such an outcome will usually not be hidden, must be high”.7 [31] Finally, we...

9. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 26 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...Replacing each document will require a fee, and significant time and trouble. Publication [34] The Tribunal will routinely publish the name of an Adviser and the reasons for its decision where a complaint is upheld. That is a usual incident of open justice, and this decision will be published in the normal way. Order [35] The Adviser is censured. [36] The Adviser is ordered to pay a penalty of $2,500. [37] The Adviser is ordered to pay compensation and refund fees amounting to $3...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 66 Ben Singh Holdings Ltd t/a Fresh VibeCafé v Singh [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...Nevertheless, the amount of security is not necessarily to be fixed by reference to likely costs awards. It is rather to be what the Court thinks fit in all the circumstances.10 It should be neither illusory nor oppressive.11 [24] Taking all matters into account here, I consider that an appropriate amount for security for costs is $7,500. This gives Mr Singh reasonable protection but is not so high that it is unreasonable to expect Ben Singh Holdings to raise it. [25] Accordingl...