Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC 403) v Licensee B [2017] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...AND ANY IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES AND WITNESSES TO THIS PROCEEDING, AND THE AGENCY INVOLVED, IS PROHIBITED. BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 001 READT 78/15 IN THE MATTER OF A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 403 AGAINST [LICENSEE B] Defendant Hearing: 28 and 29 September 2016, at Christchurch Tribunal: Hon P J...

2. LCRO 024/2018 NN v AE (23 April 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...options for consideration by Ms NN for response by 4.00 pm that day. First, he and Mrs SL would claim compensation in the [Disputes] Tribunal; secondly, he would complain to the Law Society about Ms NN’s conduct; and thirdly, they could settle the matter themselves thereby allowing Ms NN to apologise for her “error”. [13] Nine days later, on Saturday, 25 February 2017, Ms NN, while at home, learned from another client that Mrs SL, when showing the client through a house for...

3. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 5: case study of Rotorua Local Police Area [pdf, 454 KB]

   Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 5 Case study of the Rotorua Police Area Tanya Segessenmann and Karen Johns December 2005 2 Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1: Surveys of Household Burglary part one (2002): Four Police Areas and national data compared, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 2: Surveys of Household Burglary part two: Four Police Areas compared betwe

4. Christchurch Youth Drug Court pilot: One-year follow-up study [pdf, 595 KB]

   ...current situation, for example, attending courses, school, or employment, having a supportive home environment, involved in sports or cultural activities, and not associating with other youth offenders. Ø No recent offending and therefore no outstanding matters before the YDC. Ø Matters in the YDC are able to be finally determined. Ø Consensus among the YDC team members that there is no further need for YDC overview. A young person can be remanded back to the Youth Court or other Courts...

5. AD v ZX LCRO 87 / 2010 (14 December 2010) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...filed on their behalf in the Employment Relations Authority. [3] AAB had been created as a result of a merger of AAC (AAC) and AAD (AAD). [4] The Applicant had previously acted for AAC, and he had also been consulted in respect of a distinct matter arising during the course of the merger. 2 [5] The Respondent lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service alleging breaches of Rule 8, and in particular Rule 8.7.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 256 Flax Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 224 KB]

   FLAX TRUST v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 256 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN FLAX TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-4) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND SPEARGRASS HOLDINGS LIMITED s274 party Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch S...

7. Edwards - Whakatohea (2018) 181 Waiariki MB 121 (181 WAR 121) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...Attorney-General opposes the application made by Mr Rakuraku on the basis that it is outside the jurisdiction of the Court, in line with the submissions filed by Ms Wara. The Attorney-General also opposed the commissioning of expert evidence as the matters in question are matters of legal 181 Waiariki MB 124 interpretation that relate to the construction and interpretation of the Act and the s 30 order made in 1994. He says that these issues can appropriately...

8. LCRO 113/2013 AB v EF (3 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Please clarify for me. I ask the LCRO to bear in mind the structure and detailed content of my Complaint the inadequacy and indeed irrelevance of Mr EF’s response and the fact the Committee did not ask Mr EF to answer clearly and explicitly the matters at issue and come to a decision that is firmly based in natural justice. [18] It is appropriate at this juncture to address Mr AB’s allegations that the Complaints Service did not “keep him informed or ask a single question”...

9. [2021] NZACC 80 Norman v ACC (3 June 2021) [pdf, 208 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 80 ACR 358/17 ACR 209/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GRANT NORMAN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Heard at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-A-Tara...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

    AHMED ALKAZAZ v ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 15 [8 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 15 EMPC 397/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for recall of judgment/rehearing BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On...