Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 101 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...specifically addresses the importance of a non-publication order being granted in light of UXK’s medical circumstances, which were comprehensively described. The report suggests that she is vulnerable. In summary, Dr Jansen’s evidence refers to matters of fact, and outlines his opinion as to non-publication on the basis of the information provided to him. [19] UXK’s position is that neither of the medical practitioners need attend the investigation meeting. Questioning of...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 14 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union v Steelfort Engineering Co Ltd [pdf, 80 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND MANUFACTURING UNION INC V STEELFORT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED NZEmpC WN 21 February 2011 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 14 WRC 20/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND MANUFACTURING UNION INC Plaintiff AND STEELFORT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: by...

3. Matchitt - Te Kaha 65 (2014) 104 Waiariki MB 145 (104 WAR 145) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...issues of natural justice do not arise as the parties have said all they have to say on the occupation of this block. None of it is new to the Court and all of it is a repeat of the evidence and submissions previously heard. Obviously if any new matters are considered important enough, the parties may apply for a rehearing. Amendment to the Occupation Orders [20] I have reviewed the minutes of the Court hearings where these occupation orders were granted in 2010 and 2013. 6 I note...

4. CAC10003 v Kumandan [2013] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 46 KB]

   [2013] NZREADT 28 READT 037/11 & 044/11 IN THE MATTER OF charges under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10003) Prosecutor AND D H KUMANDAN Defendant BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport – Chairperson Ms J Robson – Member Mr G Denley – Member HELD on the papers PENALTY DECISION [1] This penalty deci...

5. Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust (2013) 62 Taitokerau MB 115 (62 TTK 115) [pdf, 89 KB]

   62 Taitokerau MB 115 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120012689 UNDER Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust BETWEEN TE TII (WAITANGI) B3 TRUST Applicant Hearing: 24 April 2013 26 June 2013 4 July 2013 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 05 July 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 62 Taitokerau MB 116 Introduction [1] The pri...

6. ZH v VL LCRO 149/2015 (20 July 2016) [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...the complaint by a legal standards officer to see whether any response might be required from the lawyer complained about. The process is designed to identify complaints in which there are no obvious professional conduct issues. Rather than delay matters by seeking a response from the practitioner concerned, the complaint is put directly before a Standards Committee for it to make a determination. The legal standards officer does not provide a report or opinion; the matter is simply fa...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 063 Ohau Protection Society Incorporated v Waitaki District Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...was wholly unsuccessful in their appeal as they were at the Council hearing;8 (b) the Environment Court hearing did not involve any novel points of law;9 (c) OPS did not advance any refinements to the conditions;10 (d) OPS raised a number of matters (including precedent and alternative sites) Legally described as Section 3 Block IV Ohau Lake Survey District (CFR OT10C/19). [2018] NZEnvC 243. [2019] NZEnvC 12. Application for costs by Stephen and Linda Simmons, dated 8 February 2...

8. Re Stryder (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...for each claim he filed in the Tribunal, it would be necessary that he present the original statement of claim and three copies. [7] No documents were thereafter received from Mr Stryder. [8] On 5 July 2019 Mr Stryder telephoned the Ministry of Justice administration team wanting an update on his claim. That inquiry was referred to the Secretary. By email dated 8 July 2019 timed at 12:27pm Mr Stryder was reminded that the statement of claim received in hard copy on 19 March 2019 had b...

9. [2022] NZACC 6 – Jones v ACC (19 January 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 006 ACA 02/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CRAIG RICHARD JONES Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 19 January 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to appeal] Introduction [1] This is an app...

10. WC v AU LCRO 218 / 2012 (6 June 2013) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...exercise reasonable judgement in engaging a lawyer, or the lawyer is aware that the prospective client does not wish to be contacted by the lawyer. [29] There is no evidence that this Rule was breached by Mr WC in his dealings with Mrs AV. Wider matters [30] I have concluded that the Standards Committee was correct to conclude that the conduct of Mr WC constituted a breach of Rule 14.4. I consider that it is important to undertake a wider view (or more informally to “stand b...