Search Results

1. Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Dismissal) [2017] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...contacted by Mr Mihaka on 6 April 2016 and told that he (Mr Mihaka) no longer required Mr Bourke’s representation. Mr Mihaka informed Mr Bourke that another lawyer, Mr J Gwilliam of Wellington, would now be representing him. [11] However, it is a matter of record that since 6 April 2016 Mr Mihaka has not been represented in these proceedings by a lawyer. Neither Mr Bourke nor Mr Gwilliam have appeared or filed any documents since 7 April 2016. [12] It will be seen an unsuccessful...

2. Gamble - Hopa Heremaia Trust [2021] Chief Judges MB 18 (2021 CJ 18) [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20100011141 CJ 2010/78 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Hopa Heremaia Trust I WAENGA I A Between Peggy Gamble Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 6 November 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1337-1358 (Heard at Whanganui) Whakataunga: Judgment date...

3. [2021] NZREADT 18 - Brady (28 April 2021) [pdf, 338 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 18 READT 028/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 1905 AGAINST DARREN BRADY Defendant Hearing: 24-25 March 2021, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Ms F Mathieson, Member Appearances: Mr S Waalkens, on behal...

4. [2021] NZACC 172 – Shaftyat v ACC (5 November 2021) [pdf, 409 KB]

   ...Radiology on 03.07.2014, and also 15.04.2015, and 10.10.2015. In my opinion this suggests that he has had multiple episodes of exacerbations with left leg pain much prior to his injury event of 18.11.2015. [51] Ms Johns notes that in Ellwood Justice Mallon referred to the situation where the medical evidence was unclear or imbalanced. [52] She notes that at paragraph [65] Justice Mallon said: I therefore consider that s 116 combined with the requirements in s 62 on ACC...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 128 ALA v ITE [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...past or present staff and/or elected members of the defendant organisation; (ii) Ceasing any and all communication by any means with any third party (including employees of other local authorities but not including his own legal advisor) about matters subject to his confidentiality obligations to the defendant organisation. The timeframe for compliance is immediate. [10] The Court also imposed a penalty of $6,000 and ordered payment of indemnity costs. 4 [11] The complianc...

6. Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Discovery) [2014] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...extent to which the information has already been disclosed to other persons; and (g) society’s interest in protecting the privacy of victims of offences and, in particular, victims of sexual offences. (4) The Judge may, in addition to the matters stated in subsection (3), have regard to any other matters that the Judge considers relevant. (5) A Judge may give a direction under this section that a communication or information not be disclosed whether or not the communication or...

7. CAC20004 v Li & Ors [2015] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 132 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 64 READT 003/14 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE (CAC 20004) AND ZHONG (SAM) LI First Defendant AND JANE WANG Second Defendant AND CHRISTOPHER SWANN Third Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD ON THE PA...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 22 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...date. This approach militates against the separate narrow preliminary hearing that the plaintiff seeks. [20] Next, there are two factors: whether there is a risk of inadvertently disqualifying a judge who expresses a view at the first trial on matters that are for decision at the second trial and, associated with this, whether there may be a risk of inadvertent findings at the first trial on matters that are for full evidence and argument at the second trial. The plaintiff says t...

9. Auckland Standards Committee v Hong [2014] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 110 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 030/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 3 Applicant AND BOON HONG Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr A Lamont Mr P Shaw Mr S Walker HEARING at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 30 June 2014 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the Auckland Standards...

10. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No. 3 (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 318 KB]

    ...no foundation in the statement of claim to support the allegation by Mrs Apostolakis she has suffered discrimination on the grounds of family status or otherwise. [4.2] The claim attempts to inappropriately use the Tribunal as a forum to dispute matters which have resulted from Family Court orders in DDP v KA FC Wellington FAM-2006-085-498, 13 October 2009 as well as matters determined in Apostolakis v Kolich [2012] NZHC 212. [5] Related claims against the Attorney-General have already...