Search Results

1. BORA Securities (Local Authority Exemption) Amendment Bill [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...

2. LCRO 37/2020 TA v SL and ND (27 May 2020) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...perjury or other criminal act… [5] Mr TA understands that the lawyers were not under oath, so did not commit perjury themselves. His position on review is similar to that set out in his complaint, that he should have “satisfaction in these matters” because the lawyers suborned their client to commit perjury. [6] The Committee understood the complaint was that the lawyers had committed perjury. That is not quite what the complaint says: the allegation was “suboration”. T...

3. Form 27 Criminal Fixed J [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...receipts/invoices, where applicable) Units Total (excl. GST) Interpreters preparation Interpreters in court not judge directed Library Other LINZ fees Printing of Court of Appeal casebooks Report – Medical Report – Restorative justice Translators Travel – Personal car – necessary – @ $ per km (as per policy) Travel – Plane, train, bus, taxi and parking – necessary Travel – Rental car – necessary Travel – Time – necessary Prior-approv...

4. Form-27_Criminal-Fixed-J.pdf [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...receipts/invoices, where applicable) Units Total (excl. GST) Interpreters preparation Interpreters in court not judge directed Library Other LINZ fees Printing of Court of Appeal casebooks Report – Medical Report – Restorative justice Translators Travel – Personal car – necessary – @ $ per km (as per policy). There is no GST on mileage. Travel – Plane, train, bus, taxi and parking – necessary Travel – Rental car – necessary Travel – Ti...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 42 Talley’s Group Management Ltd v Hendry [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Analysis [8] The Court has jurisdiction to extend the time for a challenge to be filed.3 There are established principles applied to assist the Court in exercising that discretion, but the overarching consideration is what the interests of justice require.4 [9] Talley’s Group Management Ltd took steps to challenge the determination within time but did not do so because of counsel’s error. When that error was discovered Talley’s acted promptly to rectify the situation....

6. [2011] NZEmpC 115 Muldoon v Nelson Marlborough DHB supplementary [pdf, 68 KB]

   BRIAN MULDOON V NELSON MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC CHCH [2011] NZEmpC 115 [16 September 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2011] NZEmpC 115 CRC 7/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRIAN MULDOON Plaintiff AND NELSON MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 24 August and 5 and 15 September 2011 Counsel: Anjel...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 135 Yu v Symbol Spreading Ltd [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...final paragraph of his letter, Mr Li stated: I do have limited time and energy and I would like to use it productively. I do not want to waste more time on crazy employees such as Mr.Yu at the cost of my future. I have faith in the New Zealand justice system and I trust you will make the right decisions on this case. [10] The Acting Registrar gave notice to Mr Li’s accountant of the intended fixture date for the hearing but there was no appearance on behalf of the defendant...

8. Zhang v CAC406 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 118 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 91 READT 035/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RONG JUN (JUNE) ZHANG Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 406) First respondent AND BRYAN ISAAC RICHARDSON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Ms C Sandelin – Member HEARD at Auckland on 26 No...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 29 Patel v OCS Ltd [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...application for interim reinstatement was pursued. I accept that delay is a factor that is relevant to the exercise of the Court’s discretion, although that must be balanced along with other relevant factors. It is the overall interests of justice that must be taken into consideration. [11] The defendant submits that the challenge is weak, compounded by issues of credibility. There are difficulties in accurately assessing the strength of a challenge at this early stag...

10. OL v PS LCRO 246 / 2011 (14 August 2012) [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...before it and accepted the Practitioner’s explanation, deciding to take no further action pursuant to Section 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act. [3] The Applicant sought a review on the basis that “[i]t would be a miscarriage of justice not to have this heard with all details and fairly on facts 2 supplied.” He attended an Applicant-only hearing where he was able to discuss the reasons for his review application. The Practitioner was entitled to attend but...