8027 items matching your search terms
...WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20100012352 WĀHANGA Under Sections 19, 37, 237, 238 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Kawerau A8D Block I WAENGA I A Between ME And KANI HUNIA Te Kaitono Applicant COLLEEN SKERRETT-WHITE AND TOMAIRANGI FOX Ngā Kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing On...
...and specific. [6] The Tribunal considers aggravating and mitigating circumstances, both of the offending and the practitioner. In relation to the latter, because of the protective purposes, the practitioner is not able to avail him or herself of matters in mitigation which would be of assistance in a criminal sentencing context: “The aim of professional discipline is primarily protective rather than punitive and considerations that can mitigate punishment in a criminal context hav...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 001 ACR 15/23, 17/23, and 18/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN TERENCE EASTHOPE Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented L Hawes-Gandar and F Becroft for the Corporatio...
...advice concludes that the Bill is not inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act. Please indicate whether you accept this advice. YES ci NO D If you accept this advice, please confirm whether you agree to a copy being referred to the Minister of Justice. YES d NO D If you accept this advice, I see no reason why this advice should not be published on the Ministty of Justice website. Please confirm whether this advice should be published on the website following introd7on of the Bill....
...interim reinstatement.1 [3] The second is an application for costs after I issued a judgment ordering removal of the AVOs’ relationship problems to the Court.2 [4] Initially, the AVOs said costs should lie where they fall in respect of both matters, but a fallback position was developed where they sought costs on the removal matter but said that these should be equivalent to any liability imposed on them in the reinstatement matter. The two liabilities would then be set off ag...
MUSA V WHANGANUI DHB & ANOR WN WC 20/08 18 November 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 20/08 WRC 24/08 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the second defendant for an order striking out the plaintiff's claim against him BETWEEN MEMO MUSA Plaintiff AND WHANGANUI DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD First Defendant AND CLIVE SOLOMON Second Defendant Hearing: 14 October...
...breached r 9.10, the Committee was wrong to decide to take no action. He submitted that the Committee should then have inquired further into the complaint. [16] He also submitted that in deciding to take no action the Committee had taken irrelevant matters into account, namely whether the complaint was a dispute as to commission (in which Edinburgh had not accepted an offer by L J Hooker to split the commission), whether there were other avenues for Edinburgh to claim commission, a...
I . r X'\ ,I ~ (~llil !Ii(},\~' ~~ ..-- \ \ 'l-{l -...J 'Q I,. ~ o ' .-) /lJJ J BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC145 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INC (ENV-2018-CHC-53) ... (continued on page 9) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Re...
DARREN VINCENT OLIVER v STUART DALE BIGGS [2024] NZEmpC 219 [19 November 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 219 EMPC 261/2024 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a sanction AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file amended pleadings BETWEEN DARREN VINCENT OLIVER Plaintiff AND STUART DALE BIGGS Defendant Hearing: On the pa...
...Counsel cautions that the effect of the Adoption Act 1955 is that Aiden Lawrence is no longer a child of the deceased and as a result, would not be entitled in terms of s 108. [8] Counsel’s view of the legal position is recorded in a decision of Justice Wild in Sainsbury v Graham [2009] NZFLR 173, which found that in adoption, the link between child and mother were severed and the adopted child was not entitled to claim against the estate. [9] Notwithstanding counsel submits t...