8473 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 33 LCDT 046/14 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of disciplinary proceedings under Part 7 of the Act BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 Applicant AND YOON BOO LEE Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr C Lucas Mr P Shaw Mr T Simmonds Mr W Smith HEARING 25 September 2015 HELD AT Auckland D...
[2012] NZACA 13 ACA 03/11 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN NEVILLE PATRICK GEORGE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Dunedin on 4 September 2012 APPEARANCES Mr Sara for appella...
...NAMES IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 141 EMPC 84/2019 EMPC 24/2020 EMPC 25/2020 EMPC 26/2020 EMPC 27/2020 EMPC 28/2020 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for leave to extend time to file challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AN...
Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 3 Literature Review: Police Practice in Reducing Residential Burglary Dr Sally Harvey December 2005 2 Research on the effectiveness of Police practice in reducing residential burglary Report 1: Surveys of Household Burglary part one (2002): Four Police Areas and national data compared, Dr Sue Triggs, Ministry of Justice, 2005. Report 2: Surveys of Household Burglary part two: Four Police Areas co
DAS TRANSPORT LTD V KIRKWOOD WN 30 April 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 48 WRC 3/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to challenge out of time BETWEEN DAS TRANSPORT LIMITED Intending Plaintiff AND HAYDEN KIRKWOOD Intended Defendant Hearing: 30 April 2010 (by telephone conference call) (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: John Gwilliam, Counsel for Intending Plaintiff Leo Watson, Counsel for Intended Defendant Judgment:...
...are identified in the determination can be revisited with the outcome being informed by the Court’s decision. [5] The plaintiff brought a challenge to the substantive determination on 14 September 2017. I shall say a little more about the matters which are the subject of the challenge shortly. [6] On 15 September 2017, I convened a telephone directions conference for the purposes of an urgent application for an interim non-publication order, that application having been fil...
...Wickliffe KW. Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 12 May 2003 Application No: A20020002622 Subject: Sections: Counsel: Waitangi A1A2 & Other Blocks 238/93 Mr Bunbury DECISION Application and Issues Minute Book: 65 RUA 168 This matter concerns an application filed by Mr Manana Kaua Terangi Reedy under section 239/93 for the replacement of Trustees. That application was filed in April 2002. After considering the grounds for bringing the application, I directed that the a...
...listed in clause [6] of these Practice Guidelines. [2] WHO CAN MAKE AN APPEAL? 2.1. A person has the right to appeal any decision made in relation to them by MSD which has been upheld (or partially upheld) by a BRC. 2.2. The full range of matters that can be appealed are listed in sections 397-399 of the Act; and for social housing matters in section 132 of the Housing Restructuring and Tenancy Matters Act 1992. [3] PARTIES TO AN APPEAL 3.1. The parties to the appeal are:4...
390 Aotea MB 31 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180004854 A20180004434 UNDER Sections 19, 43, 67, 237 and 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust and Horowhenua 11 (Lake) BETWEEN CHARLES RUDD AND PHILIP TAUKEI Applicants Hearing: 388 Aotea MB 128-135 dated 19 July 2018 388 Aotea MB 136-144 dated 19 July 2018 Appearances: L...
...and pepeha may be incorporated into these hearings on request from the Youth Advocate or Lay Advocate. Q: How are cases being triaged during Level 2? Youth Court Judges continue to review and prioritise cases to ensure that any outstanding matters requiring attention are addressed as quickly as possible. This review is being conducted using information on the file, and matters affecting the liberty of young people or regarding young people in custody, continue to be hea...