8027 items matching your search terms
MLC 22 Taitokerau MB 209 [15 June 2011] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 22 Taitokerau MB 209 (22 TTK 209) A19990002955 A20050012723 A20060029043 A20070010442 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Steven Walters to cancel a roadway pursuant to s 322 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 in respect of Horahora 1B4A2D1 An application by Ngunguru Coastal Investments Ltd (formerly BBG Coastal Ltd...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 12 LCDT 015/20 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND JOHN PAUL TIMOTHY SCHLOOZ Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K King Ms A Kinzett Mr B Stanaway Ms S Stuart DATE OF HEARING 18 March 2021 HELD AT Auckland District Court DATE OF DECISION 14...
...[2017] NZEmpC 109 [1 September 2017] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES’ IDENTITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 109 EMPC 218/2017 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a compliance order BETWEEN ALA Plaintiff AND ITE Defendant Hearing: 1 September 2017 (heard at Tauranga) Appearances: M Ward-Johnson, counsel for the plaintiff...
Rosemarke Investments Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 205 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 358 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN ROSEMARKE INVESTMENTS LTD (ENV-2024-AKL-000002) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 5 May 2024 Submissions: KRM Littlejohn and S Hiew...
...expressed to be a comprehensive apology. It recorded the significant stress in achieving a 100% commutation of his weekly compensation. A payment of $8,000 had been made to compensate him 6 to some degree. The letter dealt with other matters not material to the issue before me. [24] The Authority has been given an appendix to a letter from the Chief Ombudsman presumably to Mr Adams. I do not know the date of that letter, which is no longer available. [25] It is app...
...principles in Cousins they should be removed. In Cousins v Plaster Systems Ltd & Ors TRI 2008-101-000107 on 23 January 2009 Adjudicator Ruthe provided the appropriate test. He said: - Evidential Foundation 12 13. In Dennerly (supra) Justice Harrison stated “a party for joinder would have to lay an evidential foundation” [31]. 14. Earlier at [27] His Honour said there had to be an arguable factual foundation to justify joinder. Equally where a party is seeking remov...
...consent, properly acquired by law, the court acted outside of its jurisdiction by vesting the interests in the newly constituted trust because the application did not comply with the requirements of s 214 of the Act. Is it in the interests of justice to disturb the order? [27] Having found errors in the order in relation to the naming of successors and the constitution of the whānau trust, I turn now to consider whether it is in the interests of justice to exercise my power to a...
...were not correct. [17] The report identified and discussed other areas of non-compliance. The “own motion” investigation [18] The report was considered by the Committee which resolved to instigate an “own motion” investigation into the matters raised in the report and Ms [CL] was requested to comment on these.6 Ms [CL] engaged Mr MD to assist and advise her. [19] Mr MD advised the Committee that Mr DN had been engaged to assist the investigation and that “real progres...
2013 Chief Judge’s MB 783 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090016043 CJ 2009/36 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Paul Anderson also known as Paoro Anderson or Paul Anihana or Paoro Anihana (Jnr), deceased and an order of the Māori Land Court made on 22 August 2008 at 9 Whangarei (succession) MB 77-80 BETWEEN ANNA ANDERSON Applicant Judgment: 08 October 2013 DECISION OF CHIEF JUD...
...my powers under the Act and I would endeavour to relax the rules of evidence and assist the parties in presenting the facts and allow them to question the other parties in an informal way. I would however be maintaining the principles of natural justice. 1.16 The question of an inspection of the property was discussed at the commencement of the hearing and an inspection was made by the Adjudicator who was accompanied by those attending the hearing. 1.17 During the hearing I...