Search Results

1. Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Outcomes Evaluation 2018-19: Summary Evaluation Report [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Outcomes Evaluation 2018-19 Summary Evaluation Report June 2019 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 AODT Court — Background ............................................................

2. OIA-120087.pdf [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 10 April 2025 Ref: OIA 120087 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Crimes Act reform and citizen’s arrest Thank you for your email of 6 March 2025 requesting information, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), about the proposed reforms to the Crimes Act, which would allow greater citizen arrest powers. Specifica...

3. 2021-02-22 Minute - PC8 - Willowridge Developments Ltd - s 281 application [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...direction, which must (inter alia) state the due date for submissions;7 b. receiving submissions under s 149E from any person irrespective of whether they made submissions to the local authority;8 c. in the context of plan changes, plan variations, or matters relating to regional policy statements: i. providing a summary of the submissions received under s 149E; and 2 MOC on behalf of Otago Regional Council, 16 December 2020 at para 4. 3 At 6. 4 RMA, s 142. 5 RMA, s 141...

4. [2020] NZREADT 49 - Hammond v The Real Estate Agents Authority (12 October 2020) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...[38] In its penalty decision, the Tribunal noted the finding of unsatisfactory conduct in May 2017, but recorded that it was not submitted that it should be taken into account as an aggravating factor for penalty. The Tribunal took into account matters raised in mitigation and made orders for censure, imposing a fine of $5,500, and suspension of her licence for 90 days. 14 Complaints Assessment Committee 414 and Complaints Assess...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 149 Middleton Family Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...judicial decision of relevance and high authority; secondly, where counsel have failed to direct the Court's attention to a legislative provision or authoritative decision of plain relevance; and thirdly, where for some other very special reason justice requires that the judgment be recalled.5 [9] The Environment Court has previously discussed the powers of the court to recall a judgment, given the wording of Rule 11.9 District Court Rules 2014, which states that the court may...

6. HurricanesCrusadersChiefs v Accident Compensation Corporation (Levy Payments) [2022] NZACC 219 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...regulations; and (d) the Corporation must recommend to the Minister whether or not the classification of industry or risk should be incorporated in the relevant regulations when those regulations are next amended. [20] In Southern Lakes Building Ltd,1 Justice Lang stated: [3] … Underlying the classification regime is an assessment of injury risk based on historical records of injuries suffered by persons working in different types of workplace. … [11] Levy rates are set b...

7. LCRO 98/2022 DC v HT (20 December 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...[25] The process of review in this jurisdiction involves a reconsideration of all of the material that was before a Standards Committee. It is not an opportunity for a fresh complaint to be made about the lawyer in question. If there are additional matters concerning that lawyer’s conduct, then these must first be dealt with by a Standards Committee. [26] Accordingly, I do not have the jurisdiction to deal with the fresh issues about HT’s conduct identified by me above now raised b...

8. Taueki v The Trustees of Horowhenua 11 Māori Reservation (2011) 263 Aotea MB 210 (263 AOT 210) [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...(LAKE) MAORI RESERVATION MLC 263 Aotea MB 210 15 March 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 263 Aotea MB 210 (263 AOT 210) A20100005344 UNDER Section 19(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Maori Reservation BETWEEN VIVIENNE THERESSE TAUEKI Applicant AND THE TRUSTEES OF HOROWHENUA 11 (LAKE) MAORI RESERVATION First Respondents AND HORIZON REGIONAL COUNCIL Second Respondent...

9. LCRO 140/2017 ZS v XD (23 July 2018) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...evidence, and did not defend Ms ZS vigorously enough against allegations made about her. [5] Ms ZS complained to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). Complaint [6] Ms ZS’ complaint to NZLS sets out her concerns over Ms XD’s conduct of her matter. The complaint was determined with input from Ms XD. The Committee’s view was that Ms ZS had not provided sufficient information to prove her complaint. Review application [7] Ms ZS applied for a review saying that Ms XD had...

10. Auckland Standards Committee v Ram [2011] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...3 indicated he would plead guilty in respect of misconduct at the core of the charges. The charges sought to be withdrawn either dealt with misconduct of the same nature as covered by the charges which were proceeding, or involved less serious matters that may not have reached the misconduct threshold. [8] Accordingly the Tribunal granted leave to the withdrawal of Charges 3 and 4. Mr Ram, of course, had consented to the withdrawal in the joint memorandum of 9 November. [9] Mr Ra...